Go to main content
UPDATE Cover

TAX INCENTIVES FOR INVESTORS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLES FOR WELLBEING.

  • As of May 22, 2025, various tax incentives granted to individuals and corporations, as well as to permanent establishments of foreign residents that invest in the Economic Development Poles for Well-Being (Polos de Desarrollo Económico para el Bienestar) went into effect.

There are currently 25 “Poles for Wellbeing” in different Mexican states such as Veracruz, Oaxaca, Tabasco, Chiapas, Campeche, Chihuahua, Durango, Hidalgo, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas, Guanajuato, Estado de México, Puebla, Tlaxcala, Michoacán and Quintana Roo, which are aimed at strategic sectors such as agribusiness, aerospace, automotive and electromobility, consumer goods, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, electronics and semiconductors, energy, chemicals and petrochemicals, textiles and footwear, circular economy, clean energy, basic metal industries, paper industry, plastics industry, logistics and metal mechanics.

Through the Presidential Decree published in the Official Gazette on May 22, 2025, different tax incentives were granted to be applied during the years from 2025 to 2030 to those who start operations after this date and to those who already have authorization that accredits them as developers of a Pole that:

  • Carry out productive economic activities, as determined in each Declaration of a Development Pole.

The incentives consist of:

  • Immediate deduction of 100% of the original amount of investment in new fixed assets used to carry out their productive economic activities or those new fixed assets totally related to the activity of the developers, instead of the percentages established in the Income Tax Law which are lower.
  • Additional deduction equivalent to 25% of the increase in the expenses incurred for training received by each of its employees or for the expenses incurred for innovation.

In order to be able to apply the aforementioned incentives, taxpayers must comply with several requirements such as:

  • To be up to date in the compliance of their tax obligations.
  • Have their tax domicile in the Development Pole for Welfare where they carry out their productive economic activities.
  • To have the Collaboration Agreement entered into with the Ministry of Public Education regarding dual education; the Investment Project for the development of inventions susceptible of protection through patents or the registration of utility models, or the Investment Project for obtaining initial certification, as the case may be.

Those who apply any of the incentives may not apply jointly:

  • The tax treatment for maquiladoras.
  • The optional tax regime for groups of companies.
  • The tax incentive for trusts dedicated to the acquisition or construction of real estate.
  • The tax incentives for film and theater production and distribution, research and development of technology and high performance sports.

There are certain particular requirements, as well as different conditions established in the Guidelines published on the same date, which must be observed in the application of each of the incentives as appropriate.

Santamarina y Steta will be pleased to advise you on the application of these interesting tax incentives in case you are a taxpayer who wishes to invest in any of the areas considered within the Development Poles for Wellbeing.

shutterstock 449356852

Consolidation in arbitration: a practical mechanism for disputes arising from multi-party contracts

Consolidation is the procedural mechanism through which an Arbitral Tribunal brings together two or more arbitration proceedings to process them jointly and eventually issue a single arbitration award that is binding on all parties.

This mechanism aims to consolidate procedures that are interconnected, whether by the parties, the subject matter of the contract, or the potential consequences of the award that could affect third parties. Its fundamental purpose is to streamline the arbitration process, reducing time and costs, and avoiding conflicting decisions.

In the economic sector, consolidation has become a necessity and has been used in situations such as: (i) multiple contracts entered into with the same company; (ii) contracts concluded by a company with different parties; or (iii) Repeated contractual relationships between the same parties. In all cases, the goal is to address related disputes jointly, prioritizing procedural consistency and efficiency.

What obstacles must be overcome to successfully consolidate arbitrations?

First, consolidation often faces challenges related to the consent of all parties involved. In essence, consent is also a cornerstone of arbitration consolidation, as all parties involved must express their willingness to consolidate their disputes into a single arbitration proceeding.

However, consent may be compromised if an attempt is made to consolidate procedures with different arbitration clauses derived from different contracts.[1]However, in practice, not all parties are likely to be willing to consent to the consolidation of arbitration. In many cases, a party may have reasons to object, such as limited participation in the dispute or additional complications.

What solutions have been implemented?

Arbitration institutions have adapted their rules to allow for the consolidation of arbitrations. These rules typically require that arbitration agreements be compatible and that there be a connection between the disputes. In this regard, agreements that differ in essential aspects (such as the venue, the number of arbitrators, or the type of arbitration) are considered incompatible, although the distinction between essential and secondary aspects is not always clear.[2].

As an example, in the current Regulations of the International Chamber of Commerce[3] It does allow the consolidation of arbitrations, as established in its article 10:

“Article 10. Consolidation of arbitrations.

The Court may, at the request of a party, consolidate two or more arbitrations pending under the Rules into a single arbitration, where: a) the parties have agreed to consolidation; or b) all claims in the arbitrations are made under the same arbitration agreement(s); or c) The claims in the arbitrations are not formulated under the same arbitration agreement or agreements, but the arbitrations are between the same parties, the disputes in the arbitrations arise in relation to the same legal relationship, and the Court considers that the arbitration agreements are compatible. (…)”

For its part, the London Court of Arbitration also provides for the consolidation of arbitration in its rules in its article 22:

22.7 The Arbitral Tribunal shall have the power to order, with the approval of the LCIA Court, at the request of any party, after giving all affected parties a reasonable opportunity to express their views and on such terms (as to costs and otherwise) as the Arbitral Tribunal may decide:

(i) the consolidation of the arbitration with one or more additional arbitrations into a single arbitration subject to the LCIA Rules where all parties to the arbitrations to be consolidated so agree in writing;

(ii) the consolidation of the arbitration with one or more other arbitrations subject to the LCIA Rules and initiated under the same arbitration agreement or any compatible arbitration agreement and whether between the same disputing parties or arising out of the same transaction or series of related transactions, provided that an arbitral tribunal for such other arbitrations has not yet been formed by the LCIA Court or, if one has been formed, that such arbitral tribunals are composed of the same arbitrators; and

(iii) that two or more arbitrations, subject to the LCIA Rules and initiated under the same arbitration agreement or any compatible arbitration agreement and whether between the same disputing parties or arising out of the same transaction or series of related transactions, shall be conducted simultaneously where the same arbitral tribunal is constituted in respect of each arbitration.

In this regard, the various arbitration institutions around the world have advanced and improved their perspective to provide solutions to dilemmas where arbitration clauses in different contracts must be litigated jointly through the consolidation of arbitrations. This ensures the validity of the arbitral award and guarantees the parties eventual enforcement without any risk of nullity.

Practical recommendations for companies when designing their arbitration clauses

Given the current situation, it is suggested that parties entering into multi-contract agreements with the same entity or that share common agents should standardize their arbitration clauses and draft them in accordance with the same common elements: arbitration institution, arbitration venue, lex arbitri, language, and number of arbitrators.

By designing and implementing a common strategy for this type of transaction, the consolidation of the arbitration is legally viable and operationally effective in the event of a contingency.

This is particularly relevant for all companies that act as global economic agents, since the lack of adequate strategic planning in the drafting of their dispute resolution clauses could not only prevent arbitration consolidation, but, in the worst case, result in the nullity or unenforceability of the corresponding awards.


[1] Vlavianos, G et al. (2019) Consolidation of International Commercial Arbitration Proceedings in the Energy Sector. Global Arbitration Review. Third Edition. Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=425d0485-ad65-44be-b679-916347209fad

[2] Holman Fenwick Wilan (2021). Core Issues In International Arbitration: Consolidation Of Proceedings – Key Considerations To Be Aware Of. Available in https://www.hfw.com/app/uploads/2024/04/003468-Core-issues-in-international-arbitration.pdf

[3] Regulations in force as of January 1, 2021

shutterstock 2538476117

The use of electronic signatures in Mexico: advantages and procedural obstacles

A couple of decades ago, in 2003, our country took an important step toward the digitalization of legal acts, with the reform of various legal systems that regulate relations between individuals and authorities. The main objective of the reforms was to introduce the electronic signature as a valid alternative to the handwritten signature on paper. The aim was to facilitate the execution of contracts and legal acts through electronic means, strengthening the growth of e-commerce and remote interactions. Since then, the use of these tools has become commonplace, although to date they still face certain challenges in their implementation within the jurisdictional sphere.

In response to the need to regulate the use of electronic signatures in our country, legislators have incorporated various provisions into the legal systems that establish their bases and requirements. Among the main ones are the Commercial Code; the Federal Civil Code; the Federal Code of Civil Procedure; the recent National Code of Civil and Family Procedure; and, more specifically, the Advanced Electronic Signature Law (LFEA), which regulates their issuance, operation, and validity. These laws together have allowed the electronic signature to become established as a reliable legal tool, replacing the handwritten signature on paper.

The LFEA stipulates that an electronic signature is a set of data and characters that allows the identification of the signatory, created by electronic means under their exclusive control, so that it is linked solely to the signatory and the content of the document to which it refers. The use of this electronic tool allows any modification to the document to be detected and guarantees that it has the same effects as a handwritten signature.

However, it is important to note that, in order for an electronic signature to be fully effective as an autograph, it must meet certain requirements established by the applicable legal systems. Let's see:

The Commercial Code establishes that documents sent by electronic means have the same legal validity as physical documents, provided that the signature can be attributed to the signatory.[1]. On the other hand, in 2017, the Ministry of Economy published the Mexican Official Standard "NOM-151-SCFI-2016," the purpose of which is to regulate the preservation and integrity of these data messages sent by merchants through electronic means, thereby ensuring their evidentiary value.

This standard establishes that certain electronically signed documents must also have a certificate of retention issued by a Certification Service Provider that includes a time stamp, which guarantees that the content of a document has not been altered and the accuracy of the date on which the document was generated.

However, the problem of using advanced electronic signatures can arise in litigation when one of the parties questions the validity of the electronic signature, focusing on a lack of consent from the signatory or challenging that its use was not made by the owner of the signature. These arguments make it necessary to obtain expert computer reports during the processing of trials, which can result in costly and time-consuming expenditures.

Therefore, in order to fully sustain the validity of electronically signed documents during the processing of a lawsuit, it is recommended that the requirements established by the corresponding legislation and the referred Mexican Official Standard be complied with and expressly refer to it in court. In practice, it is also advisable to present the electronically signed document and the format of the document that allows authenticating the use of the electronic signature, explaining in detail the validation process of the signed document.[2]

In conclusion, the position held by the federal courts is clear: electronic documents are admissible as documentary evidence, provided their reliability and authenticity can be sufficiently demonstrated. While their digital nature requires careful assessment, -given the technical possibility of alteration or falsification- This does not imply their automatic exclusion from the trial. On the contrary, their evidentiary value may be as high as that of handwritten documents. Thus, the courts are strengthening a criterion of functional equivalence that recognizes a growing role for electronic media in contemporary judicial practice.[3]


[1] Article 89 Bis: No type of information shall be denied legal effect, validity, or binding force solely because it is contained in a Data Message. Therefore, such messages may be used as evidence in any proceeding before a legally recognized authority and shall have the same legal effect as printed documentation, provided that the data messages comply with the provisions of this Code and the corresponding regulatory guidelines.

[2] Stahl Ducker, Jonathan, “Main Reasons Why Judges Do Not Admit Electronic Documents in Trials” Available at https://blog.mifiel.com/razones-jueces-no-admiten-documentos-electronicos/

[3] See the separate thesis entitled “DOCUMENTS AND EMAILS. THEIR VALUATION IN COMMERCIAL MATTERS” with digital registration 2002142.

shutterstock 2370549583

The Hardship Doctrine in Commercial Contracts: A Legal Tool for Navigating Economic Uncertainty in Mexico

How can companies doing business in Mexico protect themselves against drastic changes in the terms that gave rise to their contracts?

In an increasingly volatile economic environment, companies doing business in Mexico face the constant challenge of complying with contracts negotiated under circumstances completely different from the current ones. Runaway inflation, health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the recent U.S. tariff policy, and drastic regulatory changes can fundamentally alter the economic equilibrium of commercial contracts. In this context, the theory of unforeseeability emerges as a crucial legal tool that every company must know and understand.

Legal Foundations of the Hardship Doctrine

The theory of unforeseen events, also known as rebus sic stantibus, constitutes an exception to the fundamental principle pacta sunt servanda (contracts must be fulfilled). This doctrine allows the review of what was agreed by the contracting parties to resolve or modify it when for extraordinary circumstances, unforeseeable y unrelated to the parties, the conditions of execution are significantly altered, making compliance with obligations excessively burdensome.

The foundation of this theory rests on two essential pillars:

Principle of Contractual Good FaithContracts must be executed in good faith, and when extraordinary and unforeseen circumstances seriously alter the contractual balance, maintaining the original conditions may become contrary to this fundamental principle.

Doctrine of Rebus Sic StantibusThis classic doctrine establishes that contracts are entered into with the understanding that circumstances will remain substantially the same. When they change drastically and unforeseeably, the contract can and should be revised.

State Regulatory Framework

Several federal entities have expressly incorporated the theory of unforeseeability into their civil codes, which allows for the argument that a change in circumstances due to unforeseeable events gives rise to the right to renegotiate contractual terms. This regulation can be found in:

  • Mexico City (article 1796 Bis)
  • Aguascalientes (article 1733)
  • Jalisco (article 1795)
  • Guanajuato (article 1351)
  • Coahuila (article 2147)
  • Sinaloa (article 1735)
  • Tamaulipas (article 1261)
  • Veracruz (article 1792)
  • Estado de México (article 7.35)

The Gap in Federal Legislation

Notwithstanding these local advances, the theory of unforeseen circumstances is not expressly regulated in the Federal Civil Code and the Commercial Code. Traditionally, judicial criteria have adopted a conservative position tending to reject the applicability of this theory in commercial matters, privileging the principle pacta sunt servanda.

However, this situation could be changing. The position of the Mexican courts could evolve, especially in the framework of the election of Judges derived from the Judicial Reform, which could open up new opportunities for the application of this theory in the commercial field.

Legal Alternatives for Companies

The UNIDROIT Principles as a Guidance

The UNIDROIT Principles on International Commercial Contracts offer a valuable alternative for Mexican companies. Although they are not binding in themselves, they are part of the lex mercatoria and can be used as a reference in international trade disputes.

The principle of "hardship" or "undue hardship" establishes that when an unforeseen event fundamentally alters the contractual equilibrium, the affected party may request renegotiation. Articles 6.2.1, 6.2.2, and 6.2.3 of these principles specifically address:

  • The general obligation of the contract
  • The definition of undue burden
  • The effects and procedures for renegotiation

The Vienna Convention and its Applicability

Mexico has been a party to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) since 1989. Article 79 of this Convention establishes criteria for exemption from liability for impediments beyond the parties' control, which may apply to industrial materials, manufactured components, and other commercial goods.

Force Majeure and Fortuitous Event

In the Mexican legal system, the concepts of fortuitous event and force majeure remain relevant:

  • Fortuitous event: Natural events that cannot be avoided (earthquakes, hurricanes, floods)
  • Force majeure: Events caused by third parties or authorities that make contractual fulfillment impossible (wars, embargoes, drastic changes in legislation)

Both figures can exempt the affected party from liability, provided that the unforeseeability of the event is demonstrated and that it actually prevents the fulfillment of the obligation.

Practical Application: The COVID-19 Precedent

The COVID-19 pandemic generated a paradigm shift in the application of the theory of unforeseen circumstances in Mexico. The Supreme Court established important criteria in leasing cases that could be extended to other commercial contracts: Jurisprudence 1a./J. 57/2025: It establishes that exceptions relating to exemption from payment based on fortuitous events or force majeure do not depend solely on specific deadlines, but on the judge's obligation to consider the theory of unforeseen circumstances and take into account unforeseen extraordinary circumstances.

Recommended Strategies for Companies

Preventive measures

  1. clauses of Hardship: Include specific clauses in future contracts that contemplate automatic renegotiation in the event of extraordinary events.
  2. Adjustment Mechanisms: Establish price adjustment formulas linked to objective economic indices
  3. Extended Force Majeure Clauses: Clearly define what events constitute force majeure, including pandemics, severe economic crises, and drastic regulatory changes

Corrective measures

For contracts already in force, companies should consider:

Viability Analysis: Evaluate whether the current circumstances qualify as extraordinary, unforeseeable and beyond the control of the parties

Timely Notification: The deadlines for notifying extraordinary circumstances are crucial. In jurisdictions like Mexico City, this deadline is 30 days.

Exhaustive Documentation: Compile evidence that demonstrates:

  • The unpredictability of the event at the time of booking
  • The direct impact on contractual balance
  • The resulting excessive burden

Negotiation Strategy: Propose specific modifications that restore the original balance of the contract

The Future of the Hardship Doctrine in Mexico

The Mexican legal landscape could evolve toward a broader recognition of the theory of unforeseeability. Factors such as judicial reform, recent jurisprudence related to COVID-19, and the growing complexity of international trade suggest that this legal tool could play an increasingly relevant role.

Companies that understand and prepare to properly utilize these mechanisms will be better positioned to navigate future economic uncertainties, protecting both their commercial interests and long-term contractual relationships.

The Hardship Doctrine is not simply a means of escaping contractual difficulties, but a balancing mechanism that seeks to preserve contractual justice when extraordinary events fundamentally alter the foundations upon which commercial agreements were built.

Santamarina Steta podcast: Judicial Power Election - Guide to Getting to Know the Candidates and Exercising the Right to Vote

Judicial Election: A guide to getting to know the candidates and exercising your right to vote

The judicial elections on June 1st are fast approaching, and their impact will be significant. To understand the relevance and consequences of this process, Juan Carlos Machorro, a partner at our firm, along with our associates Julio Butrón and Iván Castelán, offer an in-depth analysis. What implications do these elections have for our justice system? Who are the key players, and what can we expect from this vote?

Web Page SIZE (6)

New framework for energy planning in Mexico

  • As part of the secondary energy legislation published on March 18, 2025, the Energy Planning and Transition Law was published. Its primary objective is to establish and regulate binding planning in the Energy Sector and the strengthening of the Energy Transition, as well as the Sustainable Use of Energy, compliance with obligations regarding Clean Energy and the reduction of Polluting Emissions, maintaining the competitiveness of the productive sectors, in order to contribute to energy sovereignty, justice and self-sufficiency.

One of the key points of the so-called secondary energy legislation that seeks to implement the Constitutional Reform in relation to strategic areas and companies is binding planning based on a social approach aimed at a just energy transition.

In this context, the issuance of these laws raises a new perspective for organizing the energy sector, starting from the vision of binding planning in terms of the provisions of the Energy Planning and Transition Law ("LPTE”), which implies that this law represents a different vision for our country in terms of planning, by establishing that it will be binding, allowing both the public and private sectors to direct all their energy-related actions toward achieving clear, quantifiable, measurable, and verifiable objectives.

It is important to consider that the LPTE should be understood as the umbrella law that will allow for the integration of public policies within a framework where energy policy is linked to social and environmental policy, with the aim of moving toward the implementation of a cleaner energy matrix and thus laying the foundations for the decarbonization of the energy sector based on clean generation and emissions reduction goals.

We can consider this law's approach to be progressive, since for the first time it integrates the social vision that the energy sector must have in order to fulfill one of the fundamental objectives of the constitutional reform regarding companies and strategic areas.

The energy reform seeks to strengthen the role of social actors in the development of energy projects based on the development of a policy whose priority objective is to achieve a fair energy transition by reducing energy poverty. This concept is essential to be able to speak of the social vision with which this new legal framework is intended to be provided, where elements and tools such as the Social Impact Statement, which has objective criteria for its evaluation and ruling, will allow the communities where the energy projects will be developed to have greater acceptance and involvement, which will allow them to reach a successful conclusion with real social benefits accepted by the actors involved.

Another relevant element of the reform is the necessary link between environmental policy, social policy, and energy policy. This will translate into integration and the possibility of energy projects accessing other types of financing, such as thematic bonds, environmental bonds, social bonds, or ESG financing, a fundamental element in the reconfiguration of the energy model.

The LPTE establishes guidelines that seek to consolidate a sustainable model. In a context where decarbonization is a global priority and where environmental standards define access to financing, the lack of clear incentives for projects aligned with these criteria could hinder foreign investment in energy infrastructure. However, proper implementation of secondary legislation with a focus on a just energy transition will translate into greater investment and expansion of the energy sector.

shutterstock 2478200091

Criteria for the recognition of the authorization of research protocols issued by a Foreign Regulatory Authority are published

May 19th 2025

  • In accordance with the General Health Law, the Ministry of Health (the “SSA”) is responsible for coordinating research on human beings, which may be authorized for preventive, rehabilitative or research purposes, even when there is insufficient scientific evidence of its therapeutic efficacy or when the therapeutic indications of already known products are intended to be modified. 
  • Furthermore, the Law states that the Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risks (“COFEPRIS”) is responsible for the evaluation, issuance and revocation of authorizations in health matters, as well as acts of authority for the regulation, control and promotion of health. 
  • Under this premise, since January 4, 2013, it was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (“DOF”), the Mexican Official Standard NOM-012-SSA3-2012 that establishes the regulatory criteria of an administrative, ethical and methodological nature for the authorization, execution and monitoring of projects and protocols for research purposes for the use of medicines or materials in human beings.
  • However, in an effort to modernize the current regulation to the current conditions of the pharmaceutical market, on March 24, 2025, the same SSA published, in the DOF, the Agreement establishing the criteria for the authorization of research protocols in human subjects that have been previously authorized by a foreign regulatory authority (he "Agreement”), providing for the procedure of “Reliance".

GENERAL CONTENT

The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the list of Foreign Regulatory Authorities (“ARE”) and the criteria for the recognition of the authorization of research protocols issued by an ARE, through the procedure based on trusted regulatory practices, that is, the “Reliance”, as well as the criteria for carrying out such authorization, solely for research on human beings.

It is called "Reliance” the act by which a public institution or body authorized to exercise independent regulatory oversight over the development, production, market authorization and surveillance of medical products within its jurisdiction, called the National Regulatory Authority (“RNA”), takes into account and gives considerable weight to the evaluations carried out by another regulatory authority or reliable institution ARE, resulting in a work of simplification and updating of efforts that allow optimizing resources and reducing costs and management times.[1] regarding research protocols for a new molecule or a new use of an existing drug.

Acceptance of international standards must be based on evidence that the authorizations issued by the ARE have undergone a full and independent review by that authority, and that the ARE's requirements are sufficient to meet the regulatory requirements of the NRA, which will remain responsible for the decisions taken and will be held accountable.

Applications must be submitted through the COFEPRIS platform for procedures and services (“DIGIPRiS”). In addition to the normal requirements for submitting applications, a certified, legalized or apostilled copy with a Spanish translation of the clinical protocol issued by the ARE is required. This copy must have been issued no more than one year ago, along with an English copy of the Protocol and Investigator's Manual, with which the authorization to conduct the clinical protocol was obtained, and the Spanish version approved by the respective committees in Mexico.

Finally, the Agreement indicates that COFEPRIS will consider decisions based on regulatory practices of Reliance of the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) of the United Kingdom and the Canadian Health Agency (“Health Canada”), and will be empowered to deny authorization of the research protocol in the event of sufficient evidence of a lack of safety, quality, efficacy, purity or stability of the Protocol or of serious risks to the research subjects. 

TRANSITORY

  • The Agreement will enter into force 60 business days after the date of its publication in the DOF, that is, on Thursday, June 19, 2025.

We are at your disposal for any information related to the impact or scope of the publication of the Agreement on the Recognition of Research Protocol Authorization.


[1] Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risks. (2021). Case study: Reliance, COFEPRIS, and the international arena.

Santamarina Steta podcast: The recent court ruling on justified dismissal

The Court's recent ruling on Justified Dismissal

In this episode, Juan Carlos Machorro and Francisco Udave, partners at our firm, analyze a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation that redefines the approach to justified dismissal in Mexico. Based on a case handled by our firm, the Court validated that employers can prove the justification for dismissal with contrary evidence, even without having issued any termination notice.

The context and scope of this ruling are discussed, as well as its possible implications within the current labor justice system.

Santamarina Steta Podcast: The Impact of Donald Trump's New Executive Orders

The impact of Donald Trump's new executive orders

A few days ago marked the first 100 days of President Donald Trump's second term in the United States. During this time, President Trump has signed more executive orders than any other president in the country at the beginning of their term. In this episode, we are joined by María Elena Abraham, Counsel at a firm specializing in immigration law, to discuss why the US administration is using this tool so extensively, what it means for his administration, and its relationship with the judiciary.

Santamarina Steta podcast: More about the disappearance of INAI and IFT

More about the disappearance of the INAI and the IFT

In this episode, we talk with Paola Morales, a partner at our firm who heads the TMT and personal data protection practices, and Miguel Bustamante, an associate specializing in personal data protection, about the reassignment of functions resulting from the disappearance of the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Personal Data Protection (INAI) and the Federal Institute of Telecommunications (IFT), which will now be in charge of the Secretariat of Anti-Corruption and Good Governance, Transparency for the People and the Agency for Digital Transformation and Telecommunications, the legal and practical implications derived from the centralization of functions and the challenges inherent in the new management in these matters.

shutterstock 2602700153

Tax Refund: Individuals

During the month of April, all individuals must file their tax return with the Tax Administration Service (SAT). The system already has pre-populated information that facilitates filing and allows you to determine if you have a credit balance that can be refunded.

In this case, as an administrative convenience, the SAT offers what's known as an automatic refund, which will usually be issued within five days after the return is filed; however, there are times when it may take a few more days.

The status of the refund process, as well as any SAT determinations, can be viewed in each individual's tax mailbox.

It's common for the SAT to detect inconsistencies in an individual's income and deductions, resulting in a partial refund of the balance or even a complete rejection of the refund. Within the tax mailbox, the SAT provides the reasons for its determination, allowing the taxpayer to correct the inconsistencies and subsequently request a manual refund.

That is, you would have a second opportunity to request a refund of the credit balance; however, in the case of manual refunds, the SAT has a 40-day period to do so, and of course, it is subject to the SAT deeming the inconsistencies corrected.

Our recommendation would be to regularly check the tax mailbox to follow up on the refund, whether automatic or manual. And if the refund is definitively rejected, like any other resolution issued by the SAT (Tax Administration Service) to conclude a process, the taxpayer can file an appeal for reversal before the SAT itself or go directly to the Federal Administrative Court. An additional option is to request support from PRODECON.

shutterstock 1969022755

What's changing and what's not: key points of the 2025 reform to the Amparo Law

On March 13, 2025, the decree amending various provisions of the Amparo Law was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation as part of a broader effort to reconfigure the functioning of the Federal Judicial Branch. These reforms have a considerable impact on both the structure of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), the effects of amparo proceedings, and the way in which binding precedents are generated.

Centralization of functions in the SCJN

One of the most significant aspects of the reform is the elimination of the Chambers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. Under this amendment, the Court will operate exclusively as a plenary session, concentrating all jurisdictional powers in a single body. This centralization seeks to provide greater coherence to constitutional jurisprudence, although it also poses risks of overcrowding and delays in the resolution of cases.

As a result, several provisions related to the Chambers were repealed, including those that allowed them to generate binding case law. This reform also entails changes to the rules of jurisdiction and the way in which disputes between collegiate courts are resolved, which will now be resolved exclusively by the Plenary Court.

New regulation of the effects of protection

Another point worth highlighting is the amendment to Article 73 of the Amparo Law, which now expressly establishes that judgments declaring the unconstitutionality of general norms will not have general effects; that is, they will benefit only the complaining party. This limits the function of the amparo trial as a mechanism for diffuse constitutional review and reduces its structural impact on the legal system.

While the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation may still declare a rule invalid through unconstitutionality actions, the amparo trial remains limited in this regard.

Reduction of the threshold for mandatory jurisprudence

Another important change is the reform to Article 222 of the Amparo Law, which reduces the threshold required for decisions of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation to constitute a binding precedent from eight to six votes. This modification facilitates the generation of binding jurisprudential criteria, although it could also generate debate about the strength of the consensus reached.

Additionally, Article 223 of the Amparo Law is repealed, eliminating the possibility of the Chambers, which no longer exist, issuing binding case law. This consolidates the Plenary Court as the sole precedent-setting body.

Replacement of the CJF by the Judicial Administration Body

In line with the constitutional reform of the Judiciary, the Federal Judiciary Council is being replaced in various provisions by the new Judicial Administration Body, which will assume functions related to oversight, regulation of electronic signatures, and consolidation of files, among others.

This change seeks to strengthen judicial autonomy and reduce potential conflicts of interest between judicial and administrative functions, although its implementation also represents an organizational challenge.

Other relevant changes

  • The National Code of Civil and Family Procedures is officially adopted as a supplementary rule for amparo proceedings, harmonizing the procedure with the new national procedural system.
  • The law's language has been updated with a gender perspective and inclusive language, which entailed a general adaptation of various articles to use more inclusive and gender-neutral terms.
  • Procedural fines have been increased and will now be calculated in Units of Measure (UMAs) to discourage dilatory behavior.

Conclusion

The 2025 reform of the Amparo Law entails a structural, procedural, and substantive transformation of the amparo trial. While it seeks to provide greater coherence and efficiency to the constitutional justice system, it also raises questions about its impact on effective access to justice.

This is especially relevant in cases where the amparo (protective measure) has been used as a tool to challenge regulations or public policies with structural effects, the benefits of which extend beyond the complainant. Its implementation should be closely monitored by litigants, judges, and academics.