printable version | August 2021
On July 29, 2021, the evening edition of the Official Gazette of the Federation published (“DOF"), he "Agreement No. A/024/2021 of the Energy Regulatory Commission that establishes the regulation of maximum prices for liquefied petroleum gas for sale to the end user, in compliance with the Emergency Directive for the well-being of the consumer of liquefied petroleum gas, issued by the Ministry of Energy, in order to protect the interests of end users" (he "Agreement
Said Agreement was issued in response to the exhortation made by the Secretary of Energy through the Emergency Directive for the welfare of the consumer of liquefied petroleum gas, published on July 28, 2021 in the DOF (the "Directive”), and indicates that its purpose is to protect end users, promote the efficient supply of Liquefied Petroleum Gas prices (“LP gas”), promote the acquisition of said fuel at prices accessible to citizens, avoid discrimination, ensure that market conditions are reflected in prices and that a margin is generated that allows the recovery of costs by marketers, distributors and sellers of LP gas for the development of the industry.
Contents of the Agreement
The Agreement presents various considerations on the characteristics of the national and international LP gas market, as well as an analysis of the behavior of international reference prices and consumer prices in Mexico during the last few years. Statistics are also presented on the permits that have been granted by the Energy Regulatory Commission (“CRE”) to carry out the activities of Distribution and Sale to the Public of LP Gas in Mexico, and on the characteristics and uses of said fuel in the country, which focus significantly on the residential sector.
Based on the above, the Agreement mentions that, since LP gas is a product with significant consumption in lower-income sectors, it is of special interest to the Mexican State to promote the conditions of access to said fuel "at prices that guarantee the preservation of democracy founded on the economic and social development of its inhabitants, where the development of the industry is ensured."[1]. Therefore, the Agreement states that setting maximum prices is “necessary to correct unjustified price increases, as this is a matter of protecting Users.”
The Agreement establishes that 145 different price regions will be used, which were used until December 31, 2016, in setting maximum prices for end users. Likewise, the Agreement establishes the methodology that will be applied to determine maximum prices, through various criteria such as the region where the transactions are carried out, logistics costs, costs and sales method, and type of plant, among others. It also establishes that the CRE may make adjustments to the methodology for setting prices.
The Agreement provides that the maximum prices will be published every Saturday by the CRE through electronic means and that the permit holders who do not comply with what is established therein will be sanctioned in accordance with article 56, section III of the Hydrocarbons Law.[2] ( "LH”). In addition, various obligations are established for the provision of information to the permit holders responsible for applying the maximum prices set in the Agreement.
Finally, it is established that, pursuant to article 71 of the General Law on Regulatory Improvement, the validity of the maximum price methodology has an emergency nature and, therefore, will be temporary for a period of six months from when it comes into force.
Procedural considerations
The Agreement cites various regulatory provisions, both of a constitutional and legal nature, as well as programmatic, such as articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution; articles 1, 2, section III, 41 and 42 of the Law of the Coordinated Regulatory Bodies in Energy Matters; and 7 of the Regulation of the Activities referred to in Title Three of the Hydrocarbons Law, as well as in Section I. Policy and Government of the National Development Plan 2019-2024 (“PND
Through the provisions cited, the Agreement states that the CRE has the authority to encourage and promote the efficient development of the LP gas industry, promote competition in the sector, protect the interests of users, provide adequate national coverage and ensure reliability, stability and security in the supply and provision of services. It also addresses the objective set out in the PND of not increasing fuel prices above inflation.
Thus, although the Agreement invokes various general powers that the CRE has to issue regulations on the markets that are within its area of competence, said instrument does not refer to the content of articles 82 of the LH, nor 77 of the Regulation of the Activities referred to in Title Three of the Hydrocarbons Law, which indicate that the regulation of compensation, prices and rates established by the CRE will not be, in principle, applicable to the activities of Distribution not linked to pipelines and Public Sale of LP Gas, unless otherwise determined by the Federal Economic Competition Commission ("COFECE
Therefore, the regulations applicable to the activities of Non-pipeline Distribution and Public Sale of LP gas indicate that for the CRE to be able to impose a regulation of maximum prices, such as that issued through the Agreement, it is necessary for the COFECE to determine, in accordance with its powers, that there are no conditions of competition in said markets.
In relation to the above, COFECE issued a statement on July 28, 2021 urging the various authorities involved to respect the process established in the current regulations to set maximum prices for LP gas. This is because the SENER Directive forced the CRE to establish a methodology to set maximum prices for the final consumer of LP gas within a period of 3 days without taking into account the necessary and prior condition of having a declaration of absence of competition conditions in the LP gas market by COFECE.
Likewise, COFECE clarified that the logic behind the mechanism established in the LH and the Regulation of Activities referred to in Title Three of the LH is that a regulation of maximum prices can only be established when there is no competitive condition in the market, since otherwise the implementation of this type of regulation could have consequences contrary to those desired, such as a potential shortage or scarcity of LP gas.
It should be remembered that before the price of LP gas was liberalized in 2017, the Federal Government assigned a maximum price to LP gas without taking into account international reference prices and that the market has been analyzed and investigated by COFECE on several occasions:
- COFECE issued two declarations in 2001 and 2008, studying the conditions of effective competition in the LP gas distribution market to the final consumer. The first in 2001 indicated, among other things, that there were no conditions of effective competition in 22 relevant markets. In the second in 2008, COFECE resolved on conditions of effective competition throughout the LP gas value chain.
- COFECE has initiated investigations in 2017 and 2019, which are accumulated and pending resolution, for possible absolute monopolistic practices in the LP gas distribution and marketing market in the national territory and for possible absolute monopolistic practices in different LP gas sales markets.
- In 2018, COFECE published the study “Transition towards competitive energy markets: LP gas”, in which it warned about market concentration by a small group of companies, with the aim of having the authorities responsible for improving regulation for the proper functioning of the market undertake efforts in that direction.
- Likewise, on May 31, 2021, COFECE announced the start of an investigation to determine whether or not there are conditions of effective competition in the LP gas market.
COFECE requested that due process of law be respected and that it be allowed to conclude the investigation, through which it will determine whether or not there are conditions of effective competition in the LP gas market, so that, based on the results obtained by COFECE, CRE can determine the type of regulation that needs to be implemented, if necessary, and the correct methodology to determine prices.
As COFECE points out in its statement, prices do not depend on a single authority or regulatory body, but on a series of comprehensive actions that together are aimed at generating market conditions that push prices downwards. Only with the joint responsibility of all the institutions involved can this important common goal be achieved.
Closing remarks
The Agreement has various implications for both the industry and consumers and end users, since, as COFECE rightly points out, by not respecting the due process established in the legislation on the matter, as well as by not having the support of a robust investigation in the area of economic competition that allows determining the characteristics of the markets for Distribution and Public Sale of LP Gas, there is a risk that the actions implemented by SENER and CRE generate, among other situations, i) a negative economic impact for the regulated subjects and for the users, ii) operational losses for Petróleos Mexicanos and for private companies for Distribution and Public Sale of LP Gas; and iii) the possibility of generating a shortage or scarcity of the product, which, in turn, could impact an increase in the price of other associated products or services to cover the additional expense generated by the distortion in the market, among others.
From the perspective of economic competition, it is clear that setting maximum prices for LP gas without the support and coordination of comprehensive analysis and actions can lead to serious consequences for the market, damaging competition, with the possibility of shortages and scarcity of LP gas for regions where it is not profitable to market, and may also lead to illegal trade in LP gas.
Finally, we consider that the Agreement, like the Guideline, presents constitutional flaws in relation to the exercise of the powers of the authorities that issued them, in matters of economic competition, legality, legal certainty, due process, among others, so those permit holders, users and/or any person who considers that an injury to their sphere of rights is caused, may challenge said documents through the available means of defense, in accordance with the pronouncements of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation in this regard.
Our lawyers have extensive experience in the legal, regulatory and contractual analysis of projects, and through the joint analysis of our energy, economic competition, administrative, civil, commercial litigation and arbitration teams, we offer a comprehensive service that of course includes defense strategies. and a full knowledge of the available means of defense.
[1] Recital Twelfth, last paragraph of the Agreement.
[2] SENER and CRE may, within the scope of their powers, revoke permits issued when the regulations on prices and tariffs, as well as the terms and conditions set by the competent authority, are not respected.
If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below: