Go to main content
Santamarina Steta podcast regulations of the hydrocarbons law

Regulations of the Hydrocarbons Law

In this episode of Legal Evolution, we continue our series discussing the recent changes to energy sector legislation. Joining us are Juan Carlos Machorro, partner at our firm, and Daniela Alcántara, associate in the energy practice at our Mexico City offices, to discuss the new regulations for the Hydrocarbons Law, which include greater involvement from the Ministry of Energy, new definitions for allocations and mixed contracts, and new exploration provisions for Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX).

Santamarina Steta podcast regulations of the electricity sector law

Regulations of the Electricity Sector Law

In this episode of Legal Evolution, we are joined by Juan Carlos Machorro, partner at our firm, and Elena Ocampo, associate in the energy practice, to discuss the recently published regulations for the electricity sector law. Within the context of last year's constitutional reform and the new Electricity Industry Law, these regulations aim to define the roles of both the State and the public sector in this sector, taking into account the new focus on social impact introduced by the recent changes to the law.

Santamarina Steta agricultural water concession 2

Decree to recover expired agricultural water concession titles

On October 29, 2025, an exceptional decree came into effect granting administrative facilities to regularize concession titles with agricultural, livestock and aquaculture use, that have lost their validity or were not extended in a timely manner.

This measure represents an opportunity for concession holders in these sectors, considering the Water Authority's increasingly strict approach to water concessions. Concession titles that could be regularized under the terms of this decree must have the following characteristics:

  1. Concessions that expired between October 1, 2017 and March 1, 2025.
  2. Concessions whose extension was not requested, or was requested outside the legal deadline (6 months before its expiration).
  3. Concession volume not exceeding 500,000.00 m3 per year.

The decree grants a period of 6 months to carry out the regularization actions, therefore the term expires on April 29, 2026.

While this decree represents a favorable administrative opportunity, it will also be a time when the Water Authority will verify compliance with obligations by the concessionaires, such as: submission of declarations to Declaragua; absence of grounds for expiration; compliance with the conditions established in the Concession Title.

In our experience, it is common for some concession holders to continue exploiting their water sources even with expired permits, which represents significant risks, such as: closure of extraction points and a fine amounting to MXN$3,000,000.00. Therefore, this decree offers a unique opportunity to regularize water use, avoid penalties, and secure a concession again, which is increasingly scarce in Mexico.

At Santamarina y Steta, we have extensive experience in procedures related to the extraction, use, and exploitation of national waters, including: obtaining and renewing Concession Titles; regularizing volumes and sources; and handling inspections and sanctioning procedures before CONAGUA (National Water Commission). We would be happy to assist you in assessing whether your concessions are eligible for regularization under this decree and guide you through the entire process.

Santamarina Steta podcast: Customs Law Reform

Reform to the Customs Law

In this episode of Legal Evolution, we meet with Juan Carlos Machorro, a partner at our firm, and Michel Zelaya, an expert in our foreign trade practice, to discuss the new Customs Law Reform, particularly in light of the current government's concerns regarding tax evasion, security in customs areas, and the reconfiguration of the global trade landscape. We also discuss many of the expectations surrounding this reform and some of the prospects for its implementation.

Santamarina Steta sustainable arbitration

Mexico and the adoption of “green” or sustainable arbitrations: towards an international standard in security, sustainability and technology

Executive Summary:

  • International arbitration practice is evolving toward more digitally secure, sustainable, low-carbon procedures supported by artificial intelligence (AI). Mexico, as a key venue for commercial and investment arbitrations, faces both the opportunity and the challenge of adopting this model to maintain its competitiveness and strengthen the enforceability of awards.

What does sustainable arbitration entail?

Sustainable arbitration integrates procedural cybersecurity practices, clear guidelines on the use of AI by parties and arbitrators, and sustainability policies (“green arbitration”) that prioritize electronic communications and hybrid hearings. In practice, this translates into the use of electronic files with access control, secure evidence exchange protocols, disclosure and registration of the use of generative AI, management of personal data in accordance with international standards and sustainability criteria that minimize unnecessary travel.

The result is a more predictable, cost- and time-efficient process, with less exposure to security incidents and a reduced environmental footprint, without sacrificing due process.

International trends and comparative experiences

Leading jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States have implemented rules and protocols that strengthen cybersecurity, data protection, and sustainability in arbitration. These measures have demonstrated concrete benefits: reduced logistical times, lower costs associated with travel and physical evidence, decreased risk of document leaks or alterations, and an improved user experience in multi-jurisdictional proceedings. In Latin America, centers in Brazil and Chile have integrated guidelines for virtual hearings, cybersecurity, and sustainability into their daily operations.

Reasons for adopting the “green” standard in Mexico

  1. Risk management and compliance: Most arbitrations involving Mexican parties involve sensitive information. In fact, arbitration is often chosen simply for security and confidentiality reasons. Robust cybersecurity and data management protocols aligned with international standards mitigate enforceability and liability risks for all involved (arbitrators, lawyers, and parties).
  2. Economic efficiency: Policies paperlessElectronic files and hybrid hearings reduce operating costs and time, without affecting evidentiary effectiveness.
  3. International competitiveness: Adopting the "green" or "sustainable" standard would position Mexico as a modern and reliable location, aligned with the expectations of multinational companies, financiers, and insurers. This is true despite the challenges posed by the so-called "judicial reform."
  4. Regulatory and technological anticipation: The responsible use of AI, with disclosure and quality controls, prevents disputes about the integrity of the record and provides the courts with tools to assess objections and remedies.

Practical implementation in Mexico

To achieve its implementation, Mexico (and its various chambers and arbitration centers) would have to adopt a three-tiered strategy, involving: (i) the development of minimum guidelines on cybersecurity, data protection, sustainability and responsible use of AI; (ii) modification of model clauses (or development of a specific one for green arbitrations); and (iii) gradual adoption and monitoring of results by chambers, arbitrators and practicing lawyers.

Clearly, this is a job for all players in the national and international refereeing field.

Benefits for the parties

Adopting the "green" standard would offer more predictable processes (at least in terms of costs), less exposure to technological or logistical contingencies, and compatibility with corporate compliance systems. Arbitrations administered under these protocols would generate fewer objections and delays, and streamlined processes. discovery simpler and less costly for the parties, in addition to providing arbitration panels with better tools to preserve the integrity of the case file and justify procedural decisions. At a reputational level, these practices align with ESG commitments required in supply chains and financing for multiple companies and industries that even use arbitration as their preferred method.if not the only one-alternative means for resolving disputes.

In conclusion, the transition to “green” arbitration represents a necessary evolution for the dispute resolution ecosystem in Mexico, with tangible benefits in efficiency, security, and sustainability. The adoption of clear and measurable guidelines will allow Mexico to consolidate its position as a regional leader in international arbitration.

Santamarina Steta suspension in the amparo trial

Suspension in the amparo trial, in certain cases, to obtain it will be necessary to have an amparo trial… against the Amparo Law

On October 16, 2025, the Decree reforming and adding various provisions to the Amparo Law was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation; this was due to the initiative presented by President Sheinbaum to the Congress of the Union.

Among the most relevant reforms is the addition of requirements to obtain the suspension, the fulfillment of which will largely depend on the discretion of the Judge, and the inclusion of a transitional article that allows trials that are already in progress to be subject to these requirements.

Previously, the Amparo Law imposed only two requirements for granting a suspension. The first was that it be requested, and the second was that granting it would not cause harm to the public interest or contravene public order provisions.

Such requirements were even nuanced through jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, in which it was determined what is understood by social interest and by public order, in addition to incorporating as an interpretation tool for judges the term of "appearance of good right" understood as that the person who promotes the trial demonstrates to the Judge, only with a preliminary study of the claim, that his claim is not openly unfounded; that is, that there is a certain degree of probability that such person is right.

Now, with the reforms, the terms of those jurisprudence, which, it is emphasized, were previously used by Judges only as a reference and basis for their study, are incorporated into the text of the Law and, consequently, now the process of analysis by the Judges must be expressly stated in the resolutions, justifying the causes, reasons and motives for which the “appearance of good right” was demonstrated and explaining the balancing between that “appearance of good right” and the possible effects on the social interest.

The intention of the above is that, in order to grant the suspension, the Judge verifies and states in his resolutions whether the following requirements are met:

  • That the act being challenged exists and that there is certainty of its imminent occurrence or, at least, that there is a reasonable presumption of its existence.
  • That there is a principle of grievance; that is, that the Judge at least infers that the execution of the act complained of will affect the person who promoted the lawsuit.
  • That no significant harm is caused to the community, nor is society deprived of benefits to which it is entitled.
  • Finally, that the preliminary analysis of the claim establishes the "appearance of good right".

Based on these new requirements, it is the responsibility of the individual to demonstrate a much greater number of situations, facts, and legal circumstances, as these grant judges greater discretion. For example, in the case of a closure, one judge might consider that simply requesting the corresponding permit is sufficient to ensure that the suspension does not cause significant harm to the community, since the authority has not yet responded to that request; however, another judge might consider that submitting the request only creates an expectation of a right and, therefore, is insufficient.

To avoid that margin of subjectivity, the standard under which the suspension is requested must be increased, arguing each and every reason why, in the case of the example, the request for said permit proves the four requirements requested by the Amparo Law after the reform.

In principle, the foregoing would apply to amparo proceedings filed after October 17, 2025, the date on which the reforms took effect. However, the Third Transitory Article of the Decree allows the reforms to be applied to proceedings initiated before that date, noting that the Amparo Law is a procedural law and that, according to the doctrine and jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, it cannot create vested rights regarding future matters.

Thus, in all amparo proceedings filed after that date, the new terms of the Amparo Law will have to be applied. Therefore, given the well-founded fear that the suspension could now be denied due to the increased requirements, the lawsuit itself could include a specific ground for appeal to challenge the new articles regulating the suspension, seeking to have the previous Amparo Law applied when deciding on the suspension of the effects of the challenged acts. This would only happen if the Judge grants the suspension with respect to the application of the articles of the Amparo Law itself.

Of course, it could be complicated for a judge to suspend the effects of the new Amparo Law to resolve the suspension regarding the act being challenged under the previous law; however, it is a possibility that can be explored given how complicated it will now be to obtain such a precautionary measure.

Santamarina Steta acquisition of assets from a company declared bankrupt

Acquisition of assets from a company declared bankrupt

Executive Summary:

  • The bankruptcy stage in a commercial insolvency proceeding can represent a real opportunity to acquire strategic assets — such as machinery, real estate or rights — under a supervised judicial process.
  • For investors and companies, bankruptcy can become a strategic opportunity to expand or strengthen their value chain by acquiring key assets.

A bankruptcy proceeding is a legal process whose main purpose, during the conciliation stage, is to rehabilitate a company facing financial problems of liquidity or insolvency.

During this process, the law provides certain protections so that the company can continue operating and negotiate with its creditors the payment or restructuring of its debts, with the support of a specialist called a Conciliator, appointed by the Federal Institute of Commercial Bankruptcy Specialists (IFECOM).

However, when it is not possible to reach an agreement with the creditors, or the company itself requests its direct bankruptcy (liquidation), the procedure enters a new phase: the bankruptcy stage.

In this phase, the Bankruptcy Judge formally declares bankruptcy and orders that the administration and possession of the company's assets be transferred to a specialist called the Trustee. This professional is responsible for preserving and maximizing the value of the assets, as well as selling them to use the proceeds to pay recognized debts, according to the priority established by the Bankruptcy Law.

An acquisition opportunity?

The bankruptcy stage not only implies the closure of operations for the failed company, but it can also represent an opportunity for third parties.

Active companies or investors can participate in the acquisition of assets (such as machinery, real estate, inventories, brands or contractual rights) under a legal framework that provides certainty and transparency, since the sale of these assets is carried out under the judicial supervision of the Bankruptcy Judge and the Trustee.

In many cases, these processes allow the acquisition of strategic assets at attractive prices, while for the Trustee and the creditors, these operations represent an efficient way to maximize the recovery of resources and thus pay the credits that have been recognized as being owed by the bankrupt company.

However, it is important to keep in mind that acquiring assets in insolvency proceedings requires careful analysis, both legal and financial.

To do this, due diligence of the assets must be carried out, in which the legal, registration and financial aspects that may affect the acquisition are analyzed.

Among the most relevant points are:

  • Verify that the sale has been judicially authorized, either through auction or other type of alienation, and that it complies with the formalities provided for in the Commercial Bankruptcy Law.
  • Review the registration status and any encumbrances that may affect the property to be acquired.
  • Assess potential risks of third-party claims.
  • Define a negotiation strategy with the Trustee and, where applicable, with the relevant creditors.

Purchasing assets from a bankrupt company can represent a legitimate and profitable opportunity, provided it is carried out with proper prior analysis. The experience of insolvency and transaction specialists allows them to identify opportunities, mitigate risks, and ensure the validity of the transaction within the relevant legal framework.

Santamarina Steta Ley Silla

Developments and upcoming provisions regarding “Silla Law”

On December 14, 2025, the deadline granted by the reform known as the "Silla Law" for employers to adapt their internal regulations to comply with the provisions of Section V of Article 132 of the Federal Labor Law expires. However, questions remain regarding how compliance with these obligations will be audited.

According to the publication of the Chair Law, employers must provide a sufficient number of seats or chairs with backrests available to all employees to perform their duties or for periodic rest breaks during the workday.

Although on June 17, 2025, the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (STPS) published in the Official Gazette of the Federation the Provisions on occupational risk factors to guarantee the right to rest during the working day for standing workers (Provisions), these are ambiguous, so there is no certainty regarding how compliance with the Silla Law will be audited.

The General Directorate of Inspections of the STPS has announced in various forums that, given the ambiguity of the Provisions, it is working on a new version of the Provisions that defines the minimum rest periods that must be granted to workers who work in prolonged standing.

These new provisions are expected to be published before December 14, 2025, and while it has been informally claimed that compliance with the Silla Law will not be audited until its scope is clarified, this does not exempt employers from their obligations.

The Provisions impose, among others, the following obligations on employers:

  1. Conduct a risk analysis and integrate it into the occupational health and safety diagnosis or program, or into the corresponding preventive and corrective actions.
  2. Record in the minutes of the health and safety committee's inspections the risks detected for each worker who remains standing during their shift, as well as the preventive measures to be applied.
  3. Determine the level of risk to which each worker is exposed through the scoring procedure provided for in the Provisions.
  4. Provide the most suitable type of seat or chair with backrest: high bench or coat rack type: if standing with occasional support is required; medium back high chair: to alternate postures; adjustable ergonomic chair: whether the task can be done sitting down; or footrest: if the seat height requires it.
  5. Inform workers about the risks to which they are exposed and the preventive measures implemented in the workplace.
  6. Mark areas where seats or chairs with backrests are located when these are different from the workplace.
  7. Refer workers exposed to standing to medical attention when they experience symptoms of discomfort or impairment that may be related to their posture.

In view of the above, employers are urged to i) assess the risks to which workers who remain standing during their workday are exposed; ii) adapt its internal regulations in accordance with the obligations arising from the Silla Law; as well as (iii) monitor the publication of this new version of the Provisions, as this may change the strategy that was defined to comply with the law in question.

Santamarina Steta Podcast: The biometric CURP: Advantages and Privacy Concerns

The Biometric CURP: advantages and privacy concerns

In this episode of Legal Evolution, we are joined by Juan Carlos Machorro, a partner at our firm, and one of our most frequent guests, María Elena Abraham, to discuss the new regulations regarding the Unique Population Registry Code (CURP). The CURP was established in the 1990s to facilitate population registration and the identification of both Mexican citizens and foreigners in the country. Following several new regulations, the CURP will now include individuals' biometric data. We spoke with María Elena about various arguments in favor of this supposed strengthening of the CURP, and some of the concerns it has raised regarding privacy and data handling.

Amparo Law

Reform to the Amparo Law, the Federal Tax Code, and the Organic Law of the Federal Court of Administrative Justice: Procedural Modernization and Adjustments in Tax Matters

On October 16, 2025, it was published in the evening edition of the Official Gazette of the Federation,
a decree that reforms and adds various provisions to the Amparo Law, the Tax Code of
the Federation (“CFF”) and the Organic Law of the Federal Court of Administrative Justice
(“TFJA”). On paper, the central objective of the reform is to modernize procedures
judicial, incorporate the use of electronic means in procedural actions, regulate with
greater precision in the suspension of the claimed act and delimit the origin of the protection in matters
prosecutors and human rights protection. However, beyond its purpose, the reform
introduces adjustments that, in practice, could restrict citizens' scope for defense and
companies.

I. Digitalization and Electronic Media in the Amparo Trial.

The reform establishes the possibility of presenting promotions in both printed and printed formats.
electronic, favoring the use of the Online Services Portal of the Judiciary of the
Federation. Notifications to the parties and authorities should preferably be made by
electronic means, using the Electronic Signature, which will have the same legal effects
than the autograph signature. The integration of electronic and physical files is planned, as well as the
the obligation of authorities to create institutional profiles in the digital system. In reality,
These measures do not constitute an absolute innovation, since they respond to a practice that is already in place.
had been consolidating in recent years; the reform rather seeks to formalize its regulatory framework
and provide it with greater legal security, incorporating certain adjustments and technical improvements to
uniform its application in all jurisdictional bodies. However, it is guaranteed that the
access to justice is not conditioned to the use of digital media, allowing the presentation in
paper if the promoting party so decides.


II. Delimitation of the Concept of Legitimate Interest for the Admissibility of Protection.

The concept of legitimate interest is redefined and delimited, establishing stricter requirements for
its accreditation and, therefore, for the admissibility of the amparo trial when the complainant alleges
have it. According to the new text, to prove legitimate interest it will be necessary to: i) existence
of a real injury that is different from that of other people; ii) that the annulment of the act or
omission claimed generates a certain and direct benefit if the protection is granted; and (iii)
that said benefit is not merely hypothetical or eventual.
These requirements imply a strict delimitation of the concept as opposed to the tendency
which had been adopted following the constitutional reform on human rights in June
Hand in hand with this change, a more rigorous standard is adopted to prove interest.
legitimate, which distorts the original purpose of this figure, since the legitimate interest was
conceived precisely as a mechanism that would allow a community, without the need for
prove a violated subjective right, defend oneself against the violation of norms
constitutional rights that protect specific diffuse or collective interests, for the benefit of said
community.

III. Suspension of the Claimed Act.

Regarding the regulation of the suspension of the claimed act, a list of requirements is established
that the Judges must evaluate for its concession when it is requested at the request of a party, which
are: i) the existence or a reasonable presumption of the existence of the act complained of; ii) existence
of an injury arising from the act complained of, even if it is indicative; (iii) that the concession
that the measure does not contravene public order or the social interest, as well as that it does not cause
significant damage to the community, nor deprive society of benefits that it ordinarily receives
correspond; and, you) that the appearance of good law arises. These requirements are already
They were provided for by the Constitution and in Jurisprudence, but the reform now incorporates them.
expressly within the text of the Amparo Law, which provides greater clarity regarding
of your application.
On the other hand, the reform restricts the admissibility of the suspension of the claimed act to
introduce new assumptions in which it is presumed that its concession would affect the social interest,
particularly in financial, administrative, fiscal and prevention of operations with
resources of illicit origin. With the exception that in the fiscal area, the suspension may
be granted at the discretion of the complainant, provided that he provides sufficient guarantee of the interest
tax, also providing specific rules for firm tax credits.


IV. Extension of the Claim and Procedural Deadlines.

The extension of the claim will only proceed when the complainant is aware of
acts of authority related to those claimed in the initial claim and that had not been
previously known. The possibility of expanding the claim outside the assumptions is restricted
expressly provided for, which implies a greater requirement for completeness in the request
initial and restricts the flexibility of this figure, limiting its efficiency and reducing the possibility of
possibility of accumulating processes, opening the door to contradictory sentences in cases where
now the accumulation does not proceed.


V. Adjustments in Fiscal and Administrative Matters.

The admissibility of the amparo trial, the administrative revocation appeal and the
Administrative litigation against acts related to the collection of tax credits
that have become final and requests for prescription of said credits.

VI. Responsibility of Public Servants and Sanctions.

The obligations of public servants in the integration and management of files are reinforced,
as well as in the fulfillment of the protection resolutions, providing for criminal sanctions and
administrative measures in case of non-compliance.


VII. Transitional Provisions.

The decree entered into force the day after its publication. The Authority is granted 360 calendar days.
of Judicial Administration to adapt the electronic system and issue general agreements
necessary for the correct integration of files and the operation of digital media.
Additionally, the Third Transitory establishes that, under the pretext that it is a law
procedural, that the concluded procedural stages that have generated acquired rights will be governed
by the law in force at the beginning of the respective process, but that the reform will be applied to subsequent procedural actions, without this supposedly implying retroactive application or affecting
acquired rights, as these are future actions.

VIII. Conclusion.

The reform represents a step forward in the modernization of constitutional and fiscal justice,
incorporate technological tools and specify the procedural requirements for the provenance and
processing of the protection.
However, it introduces relevant restrictions on the suspension and extension of demand,
as well as in the defense of tax credits, which will directly impact the strategies
litigation and access to justice in tax and administrative matters. Likewise, the transitional
on the possible application of the reform to ongoing Amparo Trials, would probably generate
severe problems in its application, giving rise to conflicting interpretations, especially with the
recent arrival of new judges following the judicial reform of 2024.

Energy Transition, Biofuels and Geothermal Regulations

Following the Energy Planning and Transition Law, the Biofuels Law, and the Geothermal Energy Law, published on March 18, 2025, their respective Regulations were issued, replacing the previous framework and consolidating the 2025 energy reform. Together, these instruments redefine the regulatory organization of the sector and establish a binding energy planning system.

The Ministry of Energy (SENER), with support from the National Energy Commission (CNE), is responsible for the planning, and other agencies with specific responsibilities in environmental, agricultural, water, and operational matters are involved in its execution. These agencies include the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (SADER), the National Water Commission (CONAGUA), the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE), and the National Commission for the Efficient Use of Energy (CONUEE).

Likewise, Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) must align its investment and energy use programs with the planning instruments issued by SENER, ensuring consistency in the implementation of transition, biofuels, and geothermal energy policies.

1. Regulations of the Energy Transition Law

The Energy Transition Law Regulation (RLTE), published on October 3, 2025, repeals the previous 2017 regulation and establishes the new operational framework for binding planning in the areas of sustainability and energy efficiency.

The main aspects of the new regulation include the following:

  • SENER assumes comprehensive management of planning, under the coordination of the Energy Planning Council.
  • Mandatory planning horizons are defined: short (6 years), medium (15 years) and long term (30 years).
  • The minimum content of national energy planning instruments is expanded: Energy Sector Program (PROSENER), National Energy Transition Strategy (ENTE), Plan for Energy Transition and Sustainable Energy Use (PLATEASE), Electricity Sector Development Plan (PLADESE), and Hydrocarbon Sector Development Plan (PLADESHi).
  • The procedures for developing binding energy planning for the electricity and hydrocarbon sectors are established. SENER must coordinate these plans, taking into account the plans and project portfolios of PEMEX and CFE.
  • Two permanent technical committees (Energy Sector Planning and Information) are institutionalized, which will generate technical inputs, databases, technical opinions, and periodic reports.
  • Obliged Parties must provide SENER with the georeferenced location of their facilities, information on progress in reducing energy poverty and the gender gap, as well as records related to distributed generation and energy efficiency, for integration into the National Energy Information System.
  • Clean Energy Certificates must consider binding planning and traceability of clean generation; SENER may certify them with carbon credits and establish additional criteria for new technologies.
  • The minimum content that must be included in the administrative provisions issued by CONUEE to regulate High Consumption Pattern Users is established, including classification criteria, registration and reporting requirements, and guidelines for the mandatory implementation of energy management systems in accordance with the ISO 50001 standard, as well as verification, confidentiality, and registry update procedures.
  • The granting of authorizations, permits, and contracts in the hydrocarbon, electricity, biofuels, and geothermal energy sectors must be consistent with binding planning instruments.

Transient

  • Specific deadlines are established for the issuance and operation of key instruments of the new energy transition framework, under the responsibility of SENER and CONUEE, according to the following schedule:
Obligation or measureResponsible AuthorityExpected deadline
Put the National Energy Information System (SNIE) into operationSENER180 working days from the entry into force of the RLTE
Ensure the interoperability of its subsystems once the National Energy Information System is operational.Sector agencies and entities180 calendar days once the SNIE begins operations
Issue one-time rules for acquiring and complying with Clean Energy Certificates (CELs) for the 2025–2028 fiscal years.SENER180 working days from the entry into force of the RLTE
DACGs for users with high consumption patternsCONUEE180 calendar days from the entry into force of the RLTE
Rules for the recognition of excellence in the sustainable and efficient use of energyCONUEE180 calendar days from the entry into force of the RLTE
Methodology for building Sector scenariosSENER365 calendar days from the entry into force of the RLTE

2. Regulations of the Biofuels Law

The Biofuels Law Regulation (RLB) repeals the Bioenergy Promotion and Development Law Regulation of 2009 and comprehensively regulates the biofuels value chain: production, storage, transportation, import, export, marketing, distribution, and sale.

Among the aspects that we consider relevant to highlight are the following:

  • Technical definitions are incorporated: biodiesel, biogas, bioethanol, biomethane, bioturbosine and pellets.
  • A National Biofuel Project Portfolio is being created, which SENER can update every two years, to align investment and technological innovation.
  • Production, transportation, storage, marketing, distribution, and sale permits will be valid for up to 10 years and may be extended for periods equal to the original validity granted.
  • The procedures for the modification, suspension, transfer, revocation, and expiration of permits and authorizations granted by SENER are regulated, establishing deadlines, requirements, and procedural stages.
  • The obligation to submit quarterly logs to be included in the Biofuels Information System is established, with data on production, transportation, storage, distribution, sale, and marketing, in accordance with the formats and deadlines defined by SENER.
  • The procedures and criteria for granting prior permits for the production and use of biomass for biofuels are defined, including resolution deadlines, validity, extensions, and registration with the National Agricultural Registry.
  • Traceability and reporting mechanisms are being strengthened throughout the biofuel value chain.

Transient

  • While biomethane quality standards are being issued, SENER may temporarily authorize marketing, transportation, distribution, import, export, and public sale activities, as well as the injection of biomethane into the pipeline network, in accordance with NOM-001-SECRE-2010.
  • Specific deadlines are established for the regularization of permits and the issuance of administrative provisions, as follows:
Obligation or measureEntity / RegulatedTerm
Request the corresponding production authorization or permit for bioenergyPermit holders with current exemption365 calendar days from the publication of the RLB
Submit the Notice of Commencement of Operations to SENERPermit holders without proof of commencement of operations365 days from the entry into force of the RLB
DACGs binding planningSENER60 working days from the publication of the RLB

3. Regulation of the Geothermal Law

The Geothermal Energy Act Regulations, published on October 3, 2025, repeal the Geothermal Energy Act Regulations of 2014 and establish a new framework for the exploration, development, and licensing of geothermal resources, incorporating binding planning and environmental sustainability criteria.

The aspects that we consider relevant to highlight are the following:

  • The small-scale diverse uses modality is defined as the use of subsoil heat with temperatures equal to or less than 100 °C and low enthalpy, in polygons of up to 30,000 m².
  • The requirements and procedures for applying for exploration permits, exploitation concessions, and permits for various uses of geothermal resources are established, in accordance with the technical and administrative criteria defined by SENER.
  • It is determined that exploration permit holders must drill at least one well for every 30 km² of the authorized area, in accordance with the technical and safety criteria established by SENER, Mexican Official Standards, and the competent environmental and water authorities.
  • The requirements and procedures for the reduction or unification of concession areas are established. These areas must include geodetic coordinates, digital plans, and technical and financial schedules. The resulting area may not exceed 150 km².
  • Every three years, SENER must prepare and update the National Guide to Areas with Geothermal Potential, which will include information on enthalpy, reserves, technologies, costs, and emissions, as well as geoscientific studies on oceanic and unconventional geothermal energy.
  • Small-scale, exempt geothermal developments are regulated, requiring prior notification to SENER with the georeferenced location and expected benefits. The Secretariat may authorize electricity generation of less than 0.7 MW, aimed at reducing energy poverty and promoting energy justice in Indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities.

Transient

  • Applications for extensions of Geothermal Areas with a current permit in which the CFE has an interest must demonstrate their legal, administrative, technical, and financial capabilities.
  • Permits and concessions granted under the Geothermal Energy Act of 2014 will remain in effect until their expiration, governed by their original terms and, as a supplement, by the Geothermal Energy Act and its Regulations.
  • Within 60 business days of the regulation's entry into force, SENER must issue general administrative provisions on binding planning.
Santamarina Steta podcast reform to the amparo law

Reform to the Amparo Law

In this episode of Legal Evolution, we are joined by two partners from our firm, Juan Carlos Machorro and Mariano Calderón, to discuss the recent reforms to the Amparo Law. As one of the most renowned constitutional lawyers in our country, Mariano helps us understand the rationale behind the reforms, the evolution of the Amparo Law, the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed changes, and whether these adhere to the primary purpose of amparo proceedings: the protection of citizens.