Go to main content
shutterstock 151420769 scaled 1

Legal News: Mexican Government temporarily suspends the “Visa Waiver Agreement for Brazilian Nationals”

Veversion to print | November 2021

On November 26, 2021, the "AGREEMENT" was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation, which determines the temporary application of a visa in ordinary passports to nationals of the Federative Republic of Brazil in the condition of Visitor stay without permission to carry out paid activities, that is, for those Brazilians who want to enter Mexico as Tourists, Business Visitors, etc.

As of the entry into force of this Agreement (December 11, 2021), Brazilians intending to enter Mexico AIRWAY In the case of a Visitor stay without permission to carry out paid activities, they must process the Electronic or virtual visa.

For Brazilians who intend to enter LAND OR SEA TRANSPORT In the case of a Visitor stay without permission to carry out paid activities, they must process the corresponding visa before the Mexican consular authority.

Brazilian nationals traveling to Mexican territory who are carrying any of the following documents will not be required to present the Electronic Authorization form or a Mexican visa:

a) Document proving permanent residence in Canada, the United States of America, Japan, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, any of the countries that make up the Schengen Area, as well as the member countries of the Pacific Alliance.

b) Valid and current visa from Canada, the United States of America, Japan, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or any of the countries that make up the Schengen Area.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

shutterstock 1092798047

Legal News: Special Climate Change Program 2021-2024

Veversion to print | November 2021

On November 8, 2021, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (“SEMARNAT”) published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (“DOF”) and approved the “Decree approving the Special Climate Change Program 2021-2024 (the “PECC 2021-2024”)”.

The PECC 2021-2024 is a key instrument for the implementation of actions for Mexico to address the negative impacts of climate change on biocultural heritage, national infrastructure, the economy and the Welfare State. In this sense, SEMARNAT prepared it in accordance with the "General Axes" provided for in the National Development Plan 2019-2024, which was approved by the Inter-Secretarial Commission on Climate Change on August 6, 2020.

The priority objectives of the PECC 2021-2024 are the following:

  1. Reduce the vulnerability to climate change of the population, ecosystems and their biodiversity, as well as productive systems and strategic infrastructure by promoting and strengthening adaptation processes and increasing resilience.
  2. Reduce greenhouse gas and compound emissions in order to generate development that is socially beneficial, low in carbon and protects the ozone layer, based on the best scientific knowledge available.
  3. Promote synergistic actions and policies between mitigation and adaptation, which address the climate crisis, prioritizing the generation of environmental, social and economic co-benefits.
  4. Strengthen coordination mechanisms, financing and means of implementation between levels of government for the implementation of climate change policy, prioritizing the co-creation of capacities and inclusion of different sectors of society, with a focus on human rights.

In this regard, SEMARNAT, with the participation of the Secretariats of Finance and Public Credit and Public Service, according to their respective areas of competence, will monitor the implementation of priority strategies and specific actions, as well as compliance with the priority objectives established in the PECC 2021-2024, based on the goals for well-being and corresponding parameters. Likewise, the Secretariat of Public Service, within its area of ​​competence, will monitor compliance with the obligations derived from the provisions contained in the PECC 2021-2024.

The Decree came into force the day after its publication in the DOF.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

Anti-money laundering law

Legal News: Are specialized services considered a vulnerable activity under the Anti-Money Laundering Law?

printable version | October 2021


Although the mere fact of being registered in the Registry of Providers of Specialized Services or Specialized Works, known as REPSE, does not necessarily imply the obligation to register in the Anti-Money Laundering portal, it is essential to review the type of service provided, since this is what triggers the corresponding obligation.

The above, since, according to the criteria published by the Financial Intelligence Unit, "What triggers the obligation to carry out the registration and registration process as a Vulnerable Activity is that the service provided is carried out in terms of section b) of section XI of article 17 of the LFPIORPI, that is, that the administration and management of resources, securities or any other asset of the clients is prepared for the client or is carried out on behalf of and representing the client, regardless of whether or not said administration includes the power to make decisions on the destination of said resources, securities or assets and the service provider is limited to following the instructions of the client."

Although the criteria are not binding, they do serve as a reference and guide to clarify the question that existed regarding the obligation to register. Therefore, we recommend verifying the nature and type of obligations under the service contract to determine whether or not to register on the Anti-Money Laundering portal and avoid any contingency.

***The publication of this note does not constitute legal advice, nor is it intended to be applicable to particular cases.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

AL LAboral federal center

Legal News: The Federal Center for Conciliation and Labor Registration will begin registry functions nationwide

printable version | October 2021


On October 13, 2021, the Official Gazette of the Federation (“DOF”) published the Agreement by which it is reported that as of November 3, 2021, the registry functions at the Federal Center for Conciliation and Labor Registration begin nationwide, in union matters, collective contracts, including their contractual and salary reviews, internal work regulations, as well as all related administrative processes. Likewise, the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, the Federal Conciliation and Arbitration Board and the Executive Branches of all federal entities where the May 2019 reform had not yet come into force, must suspend the aforementioned registry functions as of the same date.

The official publication can be consulted directly at the following link:  https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5632587&fecha=13/10/2021


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

shutterstock 1236384691

Legal News: Constitutional Reform in Energy Matters

printable version | October 2021


On September 30, 2021, the President of the Republic presented to the Chamber of Deputies the “Draft decree amending Articles 25, 27 and 28 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States"(From"Initiative

The Initiative aims to modify the current constitutional text, resulting from the energy reform of December 20, 2013 (the "Energy Reform of 2013”). According to the explanatory statement of the Initiative itself, the Energy Reform of 2013 implied an impairment to the Federal Electricity Commission (“CFE”) as a result of the opening of the electricity market to private industry.

The Initiative proposes a profound restructuring of the sector in order to strengthen CFE, recovering it as a strategic area of ​​the State.

Content of the Initiative

The Initiative proposes the following reforms:

1.- In terms of electrical energy:

  • The recovery of the National Electric System is proposed (“SEN”) by the State through CFE, who, from the entry into force of the Initiative, will be responsible for the planning and control of the SEN;
  • Because the main objective of the National Energy Control Center (“DINNER”) is the planning and control of the SEN, its reincorporation into CFE is proposed;
  • CFE will cease to be a productive state enterprise, becoming a state body with legal personality, its own assets and autonomy in the exercise of functions and administration;
  • Electric power will once again be considered a strategic area under the responsibility of the State, incorporating the generation, conduction, transformation, distribution and supply of electric power as a single and indivisible process;
  • CFE is integrated as a single State agency, vertically and horizontally, eliminating subsidiaries and affiliates, keeping only “CFE Telecomunicaciones e Internet para Todos” and the subsidiaries “CFEnergía”, “CFE Internacional” and “CFE Capital”;
  • CFE will be the entity in charge of providing the supply of electric energy exclusively, so 54% of the national electric energy consumption must be generated by CFE on a permanent basis with the argument of guaranteeing supply;
  • The private industry will be able to participate in 46% of the energy generation market, as long as the above is subject to the planning and control of the SEN through CFE, which will be incorporated through CENACE in compliance with the order of production costs and the requirements to guarantee the safety and reliability of the SEN;
  • Electric power generation permits, electricity purchase and sale contracts signed with CFE, private generation and applications pending resolution will be cancelled;
  • Electricity from modifications to the self-supply permits granted in contravention In accordance with the provisions of the Public Electricity Service Law, the electricity will not be acquired by CFE. Likewise, surplus generation produced by independent energy producers will not be recognized, and
  • The rates for transmission and distribution networks, as well as rates for end users, will be determined by CFE.

2.- On energy transition:

  • CFE will be the authority responsible for the execution of the nueva energy transition proposed in the Initiative, until the new secondary legislation necessary to regulate the matter is issued by the Congress of the Union;
  • Article 27 of the Constitution is amended to grant exclusive powers to the State to establish lithium reserves as assets of the Nation;
  • A priority area will be developed for the development of the industries required for the energy transition, for which public, social and private companies will be promoted. of national capital, science and intellectual property of the State of critical technologies and equipment; national technological development, manufacturing of capital goods, inputs and equipment for final energy uses destined for electro-mobility; water-energy systems for food self-sufficiency, lighting, transformation of strategic minerals, industry, commerce, services, distributed generation and energy storage, among others, and
  • Clean energy certificates (CELs) are cancelled.

3.- Regarding the Federal Public Administration:

  • The Energy Regulatory Commission (“CRE”) and the National Hydrocarbons Commission (“CNH”) will disappear, taking their powers and attributions the Ministry of Energy;
  • All provisions issued by the authorities of the Federal Public Administration that oppose the provisions of the Initiative are hereby repealed, and
  • Within 180 (one hundred and eighty) calendar days following the entry into force of the Initiative, the Congress of the Union must make the necessary adjustments to the legal framework, in order to make the provisions contained therein effective.

Controversial aspects of the Initiative

Restructuring of the electricity sector

First of all, it is important to highlight that the Initiative is not limited to the electricity sector, as it includes the disappearance of the CNH, thereby removing legal certainty from the hydrocarbon market as well. It also includes aspects related to the energy transition and the phenomenon of climate change, again generating more doubt than certainty on a fundamental issue in which there are specific performance commitments by the Mexican State in the international arena.

Considering the electricity sector as a strategic area under the exclusive control of the State has wide-ranging repercussions. The industry would be integrated into CFE vertically and horizontally with clear situations of conflict of interest that had been clearly resolved with the Energy Reform of 2013.

The integration of CENACE as an administrative unit of CFE also presents a serious situation of conflict of interest by converting CFE into judge and party dispensing with an independent system operator in terms of planning and control.

It is established that CFE will be in charge of determining rates for distribution, transmission and end users. This again creates a situation of uncertainty and potential conflicts of interest.

The elimination of the regulatory bodies in energy matters (CRE and CNH) destroys formally which in fact It was already being squandered, by dispensing with organizations whose origin and reason for being consisted precisely in having institutional control mechanisms in charge of entities specialized in the matter and independent of the political agenda in power.

Private generation

The Energy Reform of 2013 laid the foundations for an orderly market with clear rules for participation in the sector. This sparked the interest of investors and operators, both national and foreign, who have been operating based on rights acquired under the regulatory framework that resulted from said reform.

The participation of the private sector in the generation of electric energy faces a scenario of unprecedented legal uncertainty. Not only is its participation limited by decree; it is also subject to authorization and the signing of contracts with CFE. In our opinion, this clearly anticipates a very serious situation of conflicts of interest and the violation of legitimately acquired rights.

The cancellation of permits and contracts by decree may constitute an indirect expropriation of the sector, in addition to violating constitutional principles and international commitments of the Mexican State, as indicated below.

The contractual relationships that originated from the permits that are now being cancelled will be seriously affected by the violation of the capacity of generators to fulfil their obligations. The impact is imminent not only for the generators, but also affects the entire value chain and the interest groups associated with the projects, including employees and workers, investors, creditors, clients, users and consumers.

Regardless of whether the Initiative succeeds in moving forward in the terms proposed by the Federal Executive, as of this date the recommendation to companies is to suspend the negotiation of contracts in process and revisit existing contractual relationships in matters of force majeure, changes in law and adverse material effects generated by the new regulation that is intended to be implemented.

Energy transition and climate change

The Initiative contemplates that the objectives in terms of energy transition will be established unilaterally by CFE, without any traceability in the actions to be implemented or any clear or forceful measures being distinguished in this area.

Violation of fundamental rights, constitutional principles and international commitments

The Statement of Reasons for the Initiative is based on conclusions based on dogmatic and ideological considerations that are difficult to support a serious and objective analysis of the sector. This constitutes a first element of analysis regarding the legal solidity of the Initiative.

In our view, the proposed amendments to the constitutional text are contrary to the application of multiple constitutional principles including universality, interdependence, indivisibility and progression in human rights matters.

This Initiative also generates an evident antinomy, incongruity and constitutional opposition with respect to aspects of equality, non-discrimination, the right to health and a sustainable environment, prohibition of exclusive laws, retroactivity, legal certainty, guarantee of hearing, administration of justice, private property, free competition and concurrence, proportionality, rationality, legitimate trust and competitiveness.

Furthermore, the Mexican State is a party to more than forty bilateral and multilateral treaties and agreements that protect investments originating in the participating States.

The spirit and purpose of trade agreements is essentially to ensure that economic agents participating in a given market are treated equally and fairly regardless of their nationality.

The ability of the Mexican State to modify its internal legal regime is therefore limited by the obligations assumed in the context of these agreements. In some of the treaties applicable to the case, for example, if a State Party grants a new benefit to another Party (not provided for in the treaty in question), You cannot subsequently remove this benefit and return to previous levels provided for in the treaty (ratchet clause).

The Mexican State's international commitments in this area include the United States of America, Canada, the United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, China, Germany and South Korea, among others. In all cases, there are investors from these countries who operate productive assets and hold equity stakes in companies in Mexico with interests in the electricity sector.

The measures envisaged in the Initiative may constitute a situation of indirect expropriation of the sector, by putting the value of investments at risk as a result of government actions (including regulatory changes in the sector).

The Initiative clearly violates principles embedded in international instruments including National Treatment, Most Favored Nation, Market Access, Performance and Local Presence Requirements, Non-Commercial Assistance, Non-Conforming Measures and Cross-Border Trade in Services, Investment and State-Owned Enterprises and Designated Monopolies, among others, all designed to prevent arbitrary actions by the States Parties that affect the trade and investments of their trading partners.

Means of Defense

Although the Initiative proposes reforms to the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, there are national and international arguments and defense mechanisms available to the agents involved and affected, in order to maintain and respect the balance and certainty of the current legal framework in the energy sector and other affected sectors.

In order to determine the most suitable means of defense, it is necessary to evaluate each particular case in order to identify specific effects and needs. Our office offers the possibility of supporting companies based on the arguments presented in general in this document, as well as specific aspects derived from the analysis and study of the specific case. We develop strategies for each situation, with the collaboration of lawyers specializing in energy, environmental, international, economic competition and human rights matters, constitutional litigation and protection of rights under the dispute resolution mechanisms contemplated in international treaties.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

Revocation of the suspension to the LH scaled 1

Legal News: Revocation of the definitive suspensions against the reforms to the Hydrocarbons Law

printable version | September 2021


Following the publication of the “Decree amending and adding various provisions of the Hydrocarbons Law" (he "Decree”) on May 4, 2021, the definitive suspensions with general effects granted in the various amparo trials filed against the Decree (the “Amparo trials”), the First Circuit Collegiate Court on Administrative Matters, Specialized in Economic Competition, Broadcasting and Telecommunications, with residence in Mexico City and Jurisdiction throughout the Republic, like its counterpart, the Second Collegiate Court (the “Collegiate”), resolved a complaint in favor of the federal government by revoking the admission of an amparo lawsuit filed against the Decree.

In this regard, the First Collegiate argued that the Decree does not constitute a self-executing provision, and therefore cannot be challenged merely by its publication and entry into force, since it does not cause any impact by itself, but rather requires a subsequent act of application by the authority for personal and direct harm to be generated, thereby updating the interest necessary to challenge the Decree through the amparo trial.

Although it is important to take into consideration that for the moment the Decree remains suspended and, therefore, cannot be applied until the other definitive suspensions with general effects granted in the Amparo Trials are resolved, the two Collegiate Courts competent to hear and resolve these Amparo trials have already defined their position regarding the appeals filed against the admission of the Amparo trials, which will eventually result in their dismissal and, consequently, the revocation of all definitive suspensions with general effects, thus allowing the application of the Decree.

The above does not affect or impede in any way the right to challenge the Decree once there is a specific act of application thereof.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

General administrative provisions scaled 1

Legal News: General Administrative Provisions applicable to the design, construction, operation and plugging of Disposal Wells

printable version | September 2021


On September 20, 2021, the National Agency for Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection of the Hydrocarbon Sector published, in the Official Gazette of the Federation, the General Administrative Provisions applicable to the design, construction, operation and plugging of Disposal Wells (the "Provisions"), applicable throughout the national territory, of general and mandatory observance for the Regulated Parties that carry out the final disposal of Special Handling Waste[1] in Receiving Formations[2].

The purpose of the Provisions is to establish the technical elements and requirements that must be met by those Regulated in matters of Industrial Safety, Operational Safety and environmental protection for the design, construction, operation and Plugging of Disposal Wells or, where appropriate, Conversion of Wells to Disposal Wells.

These provisions have 117 articles and 7 chapters, as follows:

  • Chapter I.- General Provisions
  • Chapter II.- Risk analysis and management
  • Chapter III.- Design of disposal wells
  • Chapter IV.- On the construction of disposal wells
  • Chapter V.- Of the injection operation
  • Chapter VI.- On the end of the injection operation
  • Chapter VII.- Supervision

The content of the publication includes the formats of the different notices and procedures.[3]to which the Provisions refer, which must be physically presented to the Agency for Safety, Energy and Environment (ASEA) while a platform is generated for their electronic presentation on the website of said Agency.

The Provisions entered into force on September 21, 2021


[1] Spent drilling fluids and drilling cuttings; as well as those that meet the criteria established in section 5 of NOM-001-ASEA-2019.

[2] Unproductive, depleted or naturally fractured hydrocarbon deposits and geological caverns.

[3] Notice of Commencement in Disposal Wells, Notice of Completion in Disposal Wells, Annual Report of Operations in Disposal Wells and Notice of Lack of Tightness in Disposal Wells.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

shutterstock 273240446

Legal News: COFECE issues Emergency Regulatory Provisions in light of the entry into force of the Advertising Law and the lack of a Resolution to the constitutional controversy

printable version | September 2021


The Advertising Law (Law for Transparency, Prevention and Combating Unfair Practices in Advertising Contracting), which came into force on September 1, establishes that the authority to monitor compliance and sanction those persons who act in contravention of the Advertising Law will be the Federal Economic Competition Commission (“COFECE”), establishing that the procedures must be carried out in accordance with the Federal Economic Competition Law (“LFCE”).

COFECE filed a constitutional dispute before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation against the Advertising Law - which has not been resolved - requesting its suspension - an issue that was denied by the Court.

Given the entry into force of the Advertising Law, COFECE, in order to provide legal certainty to the procedures initiated under the new Advertising Law and carried out before COFECE, issued on August 31 in an Exceptional Plenary Session the Emergency Regulatory Provisions to process and resolve complaints regarding the Advertising Law (“Regulatory Provisions”), which enter into force on this date.

The Regulatory Provisions aim to channel, organize and clarify how the procedures that result from the complaints that, in accordance with the Advertising Law, are substantiated and processed by COFECE in accordance with the LFCE, will be followed and resolved, establishing to this effect the provisions that the Law already has for the procedures both in the Investigation stage and in the stage of the Procedure Followed in the Form of a Trial.

As long as the Regulatory Provisions are in force, all investigations related to possible violations of the Advertising Law will be initiated by complaint and will be processed by the Investigative Authority of COFECE. Once the investigation is concluded, it may close the file or initiate the procedure followed in the form of a trial. COFECE will be able to impose the corresponding sanctions if it is proven that the conduct displayed violated the normative precepts of the Advertising Law.


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

To the IMSS

Legal News: IMSS approves transfer of disabled employees in employer substitutions due to subcontracting reform

printable version | September 2021


On September 8, 2021, Agreement ACDO.AS2.HCT.250821/213.P.DPES, issued by the H. Technical Council of the Mexican Social Security Institute (“IMSS”) in a regular session on August 25, 2021, was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (“DOF”). The Agreement approves, for one time only and without setting a precedent, that employers who have made employer substitutions to comply with the reform regarding subcontracting may terminate temporarily disabled workers and register them with the substitute company on the following day, with the same salary with which they were contributing.

This Agreement, which enters into force the day after its publication, instructs the competent IMSS Directorates to issue the administrative provisions necessary for its correct application.

The official publication can be consulted directly at the following link:  https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5629173&fecha=08/09/2021


If you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible for your matters or one of the lawyers mentioned below:

Economic package

Legal News: Economic Package 2022

printable version | September 2021


On September 8, 2021, various proposals for reforms to the Income Tax Law were presented by the Federal Executive Branch (“Income Tax Law”), Value Added Tax Law (“VAT Law”), Law on the Special Tax on Production and Services (“IEPS Law”), Federal Tax Code (“CFF”) and the Federal Rights Law (“LFD”). Among the proposed reforms, the addition of a simplified trust regime for individuals and corporations stands out, as well as the tightening of measures to combat tax evasion. Below is a brief analysis of the proposed changes.

Income Tax Law

  1. Revenue

Parameter for determining the exchange gainThe reform proposes to include a minimum parameter to determine the exchange gain, in order to prevent taxpayers, when calculating it, from determining an income lower than that which they would obtain by applying the exchange rate (due to fluctuation of the foreign currency) established by the Bank of Mexico and published in the Official Gazette of the Federation ("DOF”). Currently, the ISR Law only contemplates a maximum amount for exchange losses.

New priority for ISR accreditation. The reform aims to provide legal certainty by clarifying that the priority (order) of the credits that legal entities may credit against their annual ISR must first be applied to the amount of the provisional payments that have been made and, subsequently, the ISR paid abroad.

Backed credits. It is proposed to establish that interest paid without a business reason be considered as secured credits. In general terms, secured credits are those from which interest is paid to related parties, which are recharacterized as dividends under the assumptions provided for in the Income Tax Law.

Determination of provisional payments. It is clarified that the authorization provided for in the Income Tax Law for provisional payments refers to the profit coefficient and not to the reduction of provisional payments derived from said coefficient. Likewise, in the event that the provisional payment was covered with an amount less than that applicable, a supplementary declaration must be submitted to cover the omitted amounts, plus updates and surcharges.

Income accruable in bare ownership and usufruct. The reform proposes to establish that the consolidation of the bare ownership and the usufruct is an accruable income, specifying the manner in which the income should be calculated when only the usufruct or the bare ownership of a property is sold. The owner of the bare ownership will be obliged to carry out the appraisal and accumulate the income. The notaries will inform the Tax Administration Service (“SAT”) when they intervene in these operations. 

Business rationale in corporate restructuring. It is expected that the benefit for the transfer at tax cost will only be granted to companies resident in Mexico belonging to the same group, that is, this will no longer be possible for companies resident abroad. In addition, it is proposed to include additional requirements to the existing ones:

  • Being right in business.
  • Certain “relevant operations” carried out within the 5 years prior to the sale must have been reported to the SAT.
  • The accountant's opinion must additionally contain the following:
    • The book value of the shares subject to the authorization,
    • Organizational chart of the group with the percentage of shareholding,
    • Direct and indirect shareholding of the companies that make up the group before and after the restructuring,
    • The business segments of the issuing and acquiring companies,
    • Certification that it consolidates its financial statements for accounting purposes.

The authorization will be void if an audit determines that the related restructuring lacked a business reason.

Likewise, if within 5 years after the restructuring was carried out a relevant transaction is carried out, the company acquiring the shares must submit the information declaration on relevant transactions provided for in article 31-A of the CFF.

2. Deductions

New requirements for fuel deductions. The reform proposes that the respective tax receipt (“CFDI”), must contain the fuel dealer’s permit number, which must be valid at the time of the operation. Permits may be suspended when an imminent danger to national security, energy security or the national economy is foreseen. This modification would make the deduction dependent on a situation that is not within the taxpayer’s control, which could be unconstitutional.

Technical assistance, technology transfer or royalties. It is expected that in order to deduct payments for such concepts provided by tax residents in Mexico, these must be provided directly by the person providing the service. In the event that the contract provides that these may be provided by third parties, for the services to qualify as deductible they must be specialized and must not form part of the corporate purpose or the predominant economic activity of the beneficiary of the same.

Bad debts. For credits exceeding 30,000 UDIS, one of the requirements for this deduction is that the taxpayer sues the debtor judicially or arbitrally, and it is sufficient to demonstrate that the claim was admitted. The reform proposes establishing as a requirement for the deduction that the taxpayer obtains a definitive resolution in the judicial or arbitration procedure, which demonstrates that the collection efforts have been exhausted or, where appropriate, that the execution of the favorable resolution was impossible.

Thin capitalization. The LISR limits the amount of interest that legal entities can deduct from their foreign related parties. In this sense, only the interest that does not exceed three times the taxpayer's annual equity is deductible. For these purposes, taxpayers can choose to determine the amount of their equity solely by considering the balance of their contribution capital account (“CUCA”) and its net taxable income account (““CUFIN”). The reform proposes that to determine the equity in this case, taxpayers must subtract their pending tax losses.

New expenditures that make up the original investment amount. To deduct investments, legal entities must apply the percentages indicated by law to the “original investment amount” (“MOI”), which includes acquisition costs plus other expenses. The reform proposes to include in the MOI the preparation of the physical site, installation, assembly, handling, delivery, as well as the (expenses) related to the services contracted for the investment to work.

Notice for goods that are no longer useful. The reform proposes that in the event that investments lose their usefulness in generating investments, taxpayers must submit a notice to the SAT, to prevent undue deductions from being made.

Expenses for intangible assets in the pre-operating period. It is proposed to establish that expenditures related to intangible assets that allow the exploitation of public domain assets will not be considered pre-operating expenses but rather deferred expenses, in order to determine their deduction percentage (depreciation).

Mining lot facilities as an investment in fixed assets. The reform considers that, in the mining industry, taxpayers deduct as expenses some constructions carried out in mining lots. Therefore, the reform proposes to expressly consider these constructions as a fixed asset. Fixed assets for installations, additions, repairs, improvements, adaptations, as well as any other construction carried out in a mining lot will be subject to a 5% annual depreciation rate.

Amortization of Usufruct. The acquisition of the right of usufruct over a property will be considered a fixed asset. The usufruct built on a property by legal entities may be depreciated at a rate of 5% per year.

Information to the SAT on bank deposits. Banks must annually inform the SAT when taxpayers receive deposits of more than 15 thousand pesos per month. The reform proposes that this information be presented monthly, which can represent a heavy administrative burden for the financial sector.

Tax losses on spin-off. The reform proposes that tax losses in a company spin-off may only be divided among companies engaged in the same line of business or activity.

Tax losses when there is a change of partners. In some cases of changes in controlling shareholders, companies can only reduce tax losses that arise from the same businesses or activities that generated the loss.

The reform expands the assumptions in which it is considered that there is a change of controlling shareholders of companies for these purposes, in a period of 3 years, including, among others, a change of the holders, directly or indirectly, of more than 51% of the shares or voting interests of the company in question.

There is no consideration of a change in shareholders in cases of inheritance, donation or corporate restructuring, merger or spin-off of companies that are not considered alienation, provided that in the case of restructuring, merger or spin-off, the direct or indirect partners or shareholders who maintained control prior to said acts, maintain it after the same.

Tax regime for individuals in the primary sector is eliminated. The provisions referring to individuals with agricultural, livestock, forestry or fishing activities are eliminated, since these taxpayers will be taxed under the new simplified trust regime.

The tax regime for legal entities under agricultural law is eliminated. This regime is repealed for the same reason as the previous point.

Obligations between related parties. Legal entities must keep documentation showing that transactions with their related parties abroad were carried out at market value, through a transfer pricing study. The reform proposes this same obligation for transactions carried out between Mexican companies that are related parties. May 15 of the year immediately following the end of the fiscal year in question will be the deadline to file the related party declaration.

When a party is required to issue an opinion, or has chosen to issue an opinion, a report must be made available at the Ordinary General Shareholders' Meeting in which it provides information on compliance with the tax obligations incumbent upon it in the fiscal year to which the opinion corresponds.

New notice to the SAT for the transfer of shares of a Mexican company between foreign partners or shareholders. The reform proposes that Mexican companies issuing shares sold to foreign residents subject to taxation in Mexico must notify the SAT of the transaction. The companies must submit this notice within one month after the sale, otherwise the Mexican companies will be jointly responsible for paying the tax of the foreign resident.

PTU is not part of the UFIN calculation. It is expressly clarified that the PTU is not part of the calculation of the net taxable profit for the year, since this concept is included in the tax result, which already includes the subtraction of the PTU for its determination.

RIF is eliminated. The fiscal incorporation regime is eliminated because its taxpayers will pay taxes under the new Simplified Trust Regime.

Electronic accounting and information declaration of individuals. It is proposed to eliminate the obligation to keep accounting records and issue tax receipts for individuals with professional and business activities with income not exceeding 2 million pesos, since with the creation of the new Simplified Trust Regime, said taxpayers would not have this obligation.

Simplified Trust Regime for individuals. This new tax regime is proposed to be established for individuals who carry out business, professional or leasing activities with income of less than 3 million 500 thousand pesos, where they will be able to accumulate their income when the aforementioned income is actually received and paid; that is, when there is cash flow.

Taxpayers in this section will apply a maximum progressive ISR rate of 2.5% per year on their invoiced income, not including VAT and without applying deductions. Individuals who receive income from salaries and wages, or interest, that is taxed under this regime, may continue to apply it as long as they do not exceed the total amount established for taxation under this regime.

Taxpayers under this regime will not be required to keep accounting records or file information returns. They will only have minimal obligations, such as being registered with the RFC, issuing CFDI and having a positive opinion of their tax obligations, among others. Provisional and annual returns will be determined based on the information from their electronic billing.

Legal entities must withhold from these taxpayers only the amount of 1.25% of the corresponding payment.

Those who earn salaries exceeding the threshold of 3.5 million pesos will not be able to pay taxes under this regime, nor will those who fail to comply with their tax obligations.

Market value in transactions between foreigners. The reform proposes establishing that foreigners without a permanent establishment in Mexico with income from a source of wealth in the country will be required to determine their income, profits, gains and, where applicable, deductions derived from operations with related parties, considering the compensation or profit margin that would have been obtained between independent parties.

Income from foreign acquisitions. It is proposed to establish that the Mexican transferor be jointly liable for his foreign purchaser, if the SAT carries out an appraisal that exceeds the value of the consideration in the sale of real estate by 10%.

Alienation of shares with a source of wealth in Mexico. It is proposed to amend article 161 of the Income Tax Law to provide that in a transfer between related parties, the report on the transfer of shares must include supporting documentation proving that the sale price of the shares transferred corresponds to the market value. In addition, the cases in which the shares must be considered "outside the group" for the purposes of their deferral in a multinational restructuring are established.

It is expected that in the case of the sale of shares listed on the Stock Exchange, the SAT will determine through general rules the cases in which tax withholding will not be applicable.

When the tax authorities, in the exercise of their powers of inspection, audit the relevant operations of 5 years prior to and 5 years after the restructuring, and determine that these lacked a business reason, the authorization to defer income tax on the sale of shares between entities of the same group will be void.

When a transaction that qualifies as relevant is carried out in the 5 years following the restructuring, this situation must be reported in accordance with the provisions of the CFF.

Interest withholding rate for foreign residents. Article 166 of the Income Tax Law establishes that the interest withholding rates of 10% and 4.9% are inapplicable when the beneficial owners are related parties that receive more than 5% of the interest. derivatives of the securities in question and are shareholders in more than 10% of the voting shares of the debtor or legal entities with more than 20% of their shares owned by the debtor, in which case they must apply the 35% withholding tax.

Similarly, it is proposed to eliminate the phrase “derivatives of the securities in question” because the authority considers that it gives rise to interpretations that allow taxpayers to consider that this limitation is applicable only to credit instruments.

Income from compensation for damages. The Income Tax Law establishes that compensation for damages is income that can be accumulated by foreigners who receive it from a Mexican source. The reform proposes establishing that the withholding be made even when the judgment or award does not distinguish whether the compensation is for damages (lost assets) or for losses (lost profits). In this case, the resident abroad may demonstrate to the SAT the nature of the compensation, in order to, if applicable, obtain a refund.

Legal representative of the resident abroad. The reform proposes that tax representatives of residents abroad must voluntarily assume joint liability for their clients, and must also have the necessary solvency to respond as jointly liable.

Preferential tax regime income. It is established that when determining the income subject to this regime, the annual adjustment for inflation, or the exchange gains or losses derived from the fluctuation of the foreign currency, will not be considered. Likewise, to determine the calculation of the fiscal result in said regime, the gain or loss or the annual adjustment for inflation should not be considered.

Transfer prices

Related parties. The reform states that, as a general rule, the operations compared in these studies must correspond to the fiscal year analyzed.
Interquartile method. The Regulations of the Income Tax Law establish the “interquartile method” to calculate the price range in comparable transactions within transfer pricing studies. The reform proposes to recognize the application of this method expressly in the Income Tax Law.
Maquiladoras. The possibility for maquiladoras to request a favorable resolution of compliance with their transfer pricing obligations is eliminated, as a mechanism to prevent their related parties from establishing a permanent establishment in Mexico. Therefore, maquiladoras will be able to apply only the method of safe harbour For this purpose.

Simplified regime for legal entities. The reform proposes establishing a new trust regime for legal entities with income of less than 35 million pesos, provided that their partners are exclusively natural persons. Individuals under this regime will accumulate their income at the time it is actually received, that is, they will pay taxes based on their cash flow. Investment deduction rates (depreciation) higher than those of the general regime are also foreseen.

Legal entities whose partners control other companies will not be able to pay taxes under this regime, nor will credit institutions, nor taxpayers who obtain income from trusts or joint ventures, among others.

VAT Law

Rate 0%. The reform proposes that animal feed, as well as sanitary pads, tampons and menstrual cups, be subject to a 0% VAT rate.

Non-object acts. It is proposed to define acts not subject to VAT as those that are not carried out in national territory or that are not defined in the Law, and which are intended to generate income through acts for which VAT is transferred. These activities will have the same treatment as those exempt from VAT, so the VAT transferred to obtain income related to acts not subject to VAT will not be creditable.

Request in the name of the taxpayer. It is proposed that for VAT to be creditable on imports, the request must be in the name of the taxpayer and include the payment of the corresponding VAT, otherwise it will not be creditable.

Notice to inform the SAT of the start of activities. Taxpayers who have creditable VAT in the pre-operating period must calculate the proportion of activities at a 0% rate as of the twelfth month after their start of operations. The reform proposes the obligation of taxpayers to inform the SAT of the month in which they began to carry out operations for these purposes.

Digital services. Currently, residents abroad without establishments in Mexico who provide digital services in Mexico must report to the SAT on a quarterly basis the number of their monthly operations in the country, in accordance with the provisions of the VAT Law. The reform proposes that this obligation must be fulfilled on a monthly basis.

Failure to comply with this obligation for 3 consecutive months will result in temporary blocking of access to the digital service of the digital service provider until such obligation is fulfilled.

Use or enjoyment. The reform proposes to specify that the use or enjoyment of goods takes place in national territory when it is carried out in Mexico, regardless of the place of material delivery of the good or the place of celebration of the legal act.

IEPS Law

Importation of fuels. It is proposed that in cases where fuels are imported with a tariff rate that does not correspond to them, the authority may determine the taxes omitted, without prejudice to any applicable penal or administrative sanctions. The authority will apply the corresponding rate, without any reduction, to sanction this conduct.

Electronic tag. The reform establishes that the label for alcoholic beverages can be electronic. Establishments where alcoholic beverages are consumed must read the QR code on the label in the presence of the consumer.

Registration in the Registry. The obligation for producers, bottlers and importers of denatured alcohol and non-crystallizable honey to register in the Registry of Taxpayers of Alcoholic Beverages is to be eliminated.

Federation fiscal Code

Tax residency. The reform proposes establishing that taxpayers who are in the following situations will not lose their tax residency in Mexico:

  • Fail to submit a notice of change of residence to the SAT, no later than 15 days immediately prior to the day in which the change of tax residence occurs.
  • If they do not prove their tax residency abroad.
  • For 5 years (3 years up to now) when the entity moves to a REFIPRE (tax haven), unless it has signed a broad agreement for the exchange of tax information with Mexico and, additionally, an international treaty that enables mutual administrative assistance in the notification, collection and collection of contributions.

Suspension of deadlines due to force majeure. It is expected to expressly establish that the authority has the power to suspend the deadlines provided for in the law in cases of force majeure.

Merger – New Games. It is proposed to consider that there is alienation in the merger of companies when concepts or items arise as a result of this that did not exist prior to the merger (in the same way that currently occurs in the demerger).

Alienation by merger and/or spin-offIt is established that if the authority notices that a merger or spin-off did not comply with the requirements of article 14-B of the CFF or, if it discovers that these operations lacked a business reason, it must determine the tax on the gain from the sale of the merger or spin-off.

Business reason for the merger and/or spin-off. In order to determine whether a merger and/or spin-off lacks a business reason, the reform states that the authority must consider the “relevant operations” listed therein, within the 5 years prior to or after the operation. These relevant operations are related to the increase or decrease in the value of the shares, the transfer of share rights and the change of tax residence of the partners, among other assumptions.

Informative for relevant operations. If a “relevant operation” of those indicated in the previous point is carried out within 5 years after the merger and/or spin-off, the company must submit the information provided for in article 31-A, first paragraph, subsection d of the CFF.

Financial statements opinion in merger or spin-off. It is proposed to establish that the financial statements of these operations be audited by a public accountant.