Go to main content

Electricity initiative is disguised to filter out the State monopoly monster: Santamarina and Steta

April 26, 2022 /
  • Constitutional changes are not necessary to encourage clean energy.
  • To establish a monopoly, yes. 

CDMX, March 24, 2022. Mariano Calderón, Expert partner in constitutional matters at the law firm Santamarina and Steta He pointed out that the possible "adjustments" that are being announced in the electricity reform initiative are “a green make-up that aims to filter out a whole state monopoly monster”.

The specialist explained that it is good to incorporate fiscal incentives in ISR and VAT for the purchase of electric vehicles, but this does not compensate in any way for the damage and disaster that the intention of returning to a monopoly and monopsony means.. “To establish a stimulus, it is not necessary to reform the Constitution. It is not a constitutional issue. There are already incentives. The damage of the constitutional reform initiative is in no way comparable to the minimal benefit that incentives for the purchase of electric vehicles can represent.” said.

Mariano Calderón pointed out that the same applies to incentives for the development of electric motor technology and the revision of tariffs, which are also not a matter for constitutional reforms. “A legal reform is enough and does not mitigate the underlying damage that a constitutional reform would bring, which is required to establish a state monopoly. This damages the entire electrical system and also undermines the certainty of the rule of law in Mexico. Consequently, investment projects in the energy sector and several other industries are also affected,” stressed.

The expert also clarified that incorporating a human right to electricity is nothing more than a wishful thinking and a dead letter. If there is no budget to make it effective, it is useless. It has no effect. “In fact, the reform initiative as it stands even contradicts this right, because by making the electricity system less competitive, it makes it less viable to supply electricity in the future and goes against consumers being able to choose who to buy from. Establishing a monopoly/monopsony is contrary to promoting the human right to electricity,” concluded.


Mexico City Office

Tel. +52 55 5279 5400

Monterrey Office

Tel. +52 81 8133 6000

Queretaro Office

Tel. +52 442 290 0290

Related articles

Electronic Value Manifestation MVE

New facilities and extension for compliance with the Ma…

Executive Summary: The SAT announced modifications to the General Rules for Foreign Trade for 2026 that postpone the mandatory entry into force of the Declaration of Value…
Santamarina and Steta digital fraud CDMX

New article in the Penal Code for the Federal District…

Addition of Article 231 BIS This article was added to the Penal Code for the Federal District by decree of the Congress of Mexico City…
Santamarina Steta e Firma

Implementation of the e.signature as the only valid means for…

On July 16, 2026, Agreement ACDO.AS2.HCT.290626/176.P.DIR, issued by the H. Technical Council, was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF)…